Which Blonde Bimbo would you rather Bonk?

Well this was one that I simply could not let pass by - the pussy fight of the blonde bimbos or “Two Bimbos and the Shrink”. It exposed the real Aussie work place and does put in context how artificial the whole women's liberation thing is in Anglo Saxon culture. This whole thing of an older blonde chic desperately attempting to compete against an up and coming younger blonde chic based purely on the bonkability factor (sex appeal) is very much a symptom of Western society and particularly Anglo Saxon based society.

Blonde Bimbo pussy fight

So, as much as we may want to go on about women's equality, as long as Western women assess their own self-worth simply on the basis of their bonkability rating, nothing really is going to change.

The real test is that if you gave images of the three chics and asked any Anglo Saxon, which one was the doctor, most if not all would pick it right.

I must say Shnooky looked particularly hot in her little "blue" number (can't say I've ever seen her before and I suspect the outfit barely covered her knickers!) - much more sexy than the old hen. It sorta equalised after she got the ugly “black” jacket on. Shnooky was never going to "remember" to wear a jacket. She wasn't going to down-grade her bonkability rating without a fight! She probably hoped the old hen would ignore it. The false expression on her face when ole hen brought it up is simply gold! A lesson for the Shnook - old chics aint gonna let you young chics get ahead too easy!!!

The media and the public went crazy over analysing the situation and attempting to rationalise it in the context of a sophisticated society. But, it really was a straight forward pussy fight - old hen, with declining bonkability rating, attempting to keep her job. Anglo Saxon culture is simple, carnal and predictable. Regardless of what one might say they both have their jobs because of their bonkability - that's how the Anglo Saxon world works. They certainly don't hold their positions due to their intellect! But then, which blonde chic does?!

The best part of the video was the shrink’s reactions which changed from amusement to disdain and complete disbelief (at the nature of the pussy fight) to an almost horrified look. Being quick thinking she offered to get a jacket on herself. But no, the ugly mother hen, needed the bonkable chic to look ugly! Of course the old hen could always have picked up a jacket herself, right?! WRONG!!

In reality, it is most probably that neither is blonde. They just have to be to work in the Anglo Saxon TV industry. Blondes have a higher bonkability rating in their culture. So, audiences are greater which means more money. Try finding a non-blonde chic on Aussie commercial TV!

The other amusing aspect was how they all switched on their happy faces in a matter of seconds and the program went through faultless. Complete superficial drivel.

Whilst Anglo Saxons make a habit of picking on faults of other cultures when it comes to treatment of women, maybe they should take a real good look at themselves! No culture sexualises their women in the way the Anglo Saxons do – and sadly it’s done by both the men and women!

So getting back to the original question of, which blonde bimbo would you rather bonk?! Frankly, I say “stuff the blondes” (pardon the pun), I bids’ the shrink!

Rage for Respect and Recognise

My dear wife, in all her wisdom, has, with vigour and determination, volunteered to work with the indigenous people of Australia in the "Recognise" movement. I don't think that she, for one moment, sat and thought through this very well and perhaps its best that she didn’t!

"Stuff Brexit and Same Sex Marriage, the "Recognise" movements challenge is far, far greater!"

This is about a group of people, who over 200 or so years, have been exterminated to a mere 3% minority of Australia. Their struggle for recognition is therefore a significantly greater challenge than Brexit or SSM and to add to things it is in an environment where the Anglo Saxons around the world have simply gone loopy (ala. Brexit, Trump, Abbot, Turnbull, Farage, Boris Johnson) and feel their domination and control of the world is under threat - Bring on the BRICS, we are sick of the GuSWhiSuCs.

What is disappointing about the situation is that none of the non-white communities in Australia realise that this movement is a struggle representing them as well - the constitution discriminates against all of them and they are blissfully ignorant or terrified to take action against it - lest they be sent home!! What's worse is that the constitution does allow the government to send them home!

There are a hand full who have read the Australian constitution (I need to confess that up front). In many ways, that’s a good thing, because it is such trash. The constitution has little impact what-so-ever in our day to day lives. The only time it does come into play is when a Neo-Con Right wing government (a la Abbott and Turnbull or Howard on behalf of Bush!) attempt to violate human rights against people who are non-white or non-Anglo Saxon . And we find, time and time again, that it is dismally ineffective at protecting human rights.

Australians just assume that, like the American constitution, theirs is one that was written by visionary, wise, forefathers of the nation and therefore it is good for the nation. The thing is that the Australian constitution was written in a completely different context from the American. Whilst Australians would love to be critical (usually they aren't intelligent enough to even contemplate it) of the American constitution, the reality is that it was written in a completely different context by people with quite different levels of intellect than the Australian.

The American constitution was written by visionaries who had just fought for liberties, freedom and independence from a brutal master. It was also during a philosophical clash about slavery - one that was successfully won by these same visionaries a few years later. This was a period of possibly the greatest change in social values in America. The drive was for blasting through shackles, opening up new opportunities, expanding the vision!

In contrast, the Australian experience was quite different. It was written by a collection of half-wit criminal ning-nongs masquerading as the social elite - judges etc.- with the intent of confirming, embedding and sustaining Anglo Saxon control across the whole continent. The drive was all about tightening the shackles on all but one, closing opportunities for all but one, narrowing the vision!

So, unlike the American constitution which has helped America prosper and remain an all-encompassing nation, the Australian constitution has only been an obstacle. And whilst Australian love to be self-adulating on matters such and racism and multiculturalism, it's more a case of the nation still being at a stage of immature denial than reality. While the rest of the world has accepted the extent of racism and are proactively acting to rectify it. We must never forget that it is this constitution that gave rise to the "White Australia" policy - one of only three (Israel and South Africa) nations that have ever had openly apartheid policy.

Many Australians (even white) would be alarmed by, not only the statements of the constitution, but also the views of the people who wrote it, if only they knew anything about it. But as I said before - they are blissfully ignorant.

Just a few excepts of the wonderful Australian constitution:

Chapter 5 - the states, section 116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion

"The commonwealth shall not make any law for

1. Establishing any religion; OR
2. For imposing any religious observance; OR
3. For prohibiting the free exercise of any religion

AND

No religious test shall be required as a qualification any

1. Office; OR
2. public trust

under the commonwealth"

Yours truly is no lawyer, but it appears to me that this should have been two statements. The first part is non-threatening to the Anglican Anglo Saxons (GuSWhiSuCs) and is visionary. Not so, the second part. It appears that a religious test is prevented for only two scenarios. In all other scenarios people can be discriminated based on their religion or the lack of it.

One can only think that the only religion that these ning-nongs were feeling threatened by at the time would have been Catholicism. But in the present context, it has really come in handy for the neo-cons to develop their highly religious based discriminatory laws.

One would have thought this section would have been turned upside down and rather than listing where discrimination was not possible, they said it was not possible at all and then listed some exceptions such as religious roles. But that would not have met the underlying intent of the constitution.

When it comes to racism, the whole bunch of ning-nongs were racists and not surprisingly this is reflected in the constitution.

Part 4 - Both houses of Parliament, section 51 Legislative powers of the Parliament

"The Parliament shall, subject to this constitution, have to powers to make laws for peace, order and good government of the commonwealth with respect to:

xxvi the people of any race for which it deemed necessary to make special laws "

This is an outrageous statement and would not exist in the constitution of any civilised society. A racist, white supremacist society maybe, but not in a civilised society. It is a clear give-away of what the constitution was intended to accomplish.

Now let's look at the views of the some of the forefathers who wrote this drivel and greatly admired by Australians.

Barton really had some colourful views on races. One would say they were second to none but Churchill. This was the villain who was Australia's first prime minister. Barton's justification for the "Races powers" clause, stated above, was paraphrased as

"It enables the parliament to deal with people of any alien race after they have entered the Commonwealth;

to localise them within defined areas, to restrict their migration, to confine them to certain occupations,

OR

to give them special protection and secure their return after a certain period to the country whence they came"

All very noble causes, it seems.

"We are guarding the last part of the world in which the higher races can live and increase freely for the higher civilisation.”

The fool was a complete racist fraud borrowing ideas from others (Churchill and Roosevelt) and implementing to "White Australia" policy. This Dumbo plagiarised an entire statement on immigration from Roosevelt - pretty much word for word replacing America with Australia. The dumb Aussies were none the wiser!

In introducing the "White Australia" bill in parliament, this idiot said

"I do not think either that the doctrine of the equality of man was really ever intended to include racial equality. There is no racial equality. There is that basic inequality. These races are, in comparison with white races - I think no one wants convincing of this fact - unequal and inferior. The doctrine of the equality of man was never intended to apply to the equality of the Englishman and the Chinaman. There is deep-set difference, and we see no prospect and no promise of its ever being effaced. Nothing in this world can up these two races upon an equality. Nothing we can do by cultivation, by refinement or by anything else will make some races equal to others"

It is ironic that this buffoon picked on the Chinese as it is this very race that has turned the Anglo Saxon (or Englishman's) world completely loopy!

The first Chief Justice, dick head (Sir) Sam Griffith's intelligent contribution was

"What I have had more particularly in my own mind was the immigration of coolies from British India, or any eastern people subject to civilised powers… I maintain that no state should be allowed, because the federal parliament did not choose to make a law on the subject, to allow the state to be flooded by such people as I have referred to."

So much for equal justice - not much has changed in a hundred years.

As with Churchill, these men were proud of their eloquence and a completely misguided mob. But due to their arrogance and bravado, they would grandly make these vulgar statements publicly and therefore there is plenty of evidence of their red-neck simplicity and ignorance.

But one has to give them credit where it is due, the laws accomplished what they intended to. An eerie statement by Alfred Deakin, the first Attorney General and second Prime Minister:

"Little more than a hundred years ago Australia was a Dark Continent in every sense of the term. There was not a white man within its borders. In another century the probability is that Australia will be a White Continent with not a black or even dark skin amongst its inhabitants. The aboriginal race has died out in the South and is dying fast in the North and West even where most gently treated. Other races are to be excluded by legislation if they are tinted to any degree."

. . . and so it is – a predominantly “white continent”.

You got to love the terms used such as "tinted"!!! Yours truly did not realise that I was of a tinted race! I suspect the word "dying" is used rather loosely - exterminated might have been more appropriate! How annoying the North and West were so bloody ineffective at ridding their states of this inferior tinted race. I suspect there would be many Australians who think that the indigenous people of Australia should be thankful to the Whites for not exterminating them completely!

The reality is that Recognise is bound to fail. For one, it is rather narrowly focussed on only two groups of people - aboriginals and Torres strait Islanders - who constitute just 3% of the population. Whilst special consideration must be made to recognise that Australia is older than White settlement, the flaws in the constitution are blatantly around racism and religion which impact all minority races and religion in Australia. It is much more likely to succeed if it was broadened to make this an issue for all minorities.

Secondly, the average red-neck white Aussie is simply wallowing in their own cesspit and is incapable of thinking beyond that. "Who gives a f--- about the constitution" would be their response. Most wouldn't know one existed let alone what it did for them.

So, sadly, as much as I would wish that the efforts of my wife and other intellectuals bring success to the movement - I feel the challenge maybe immense. Good luck to "Recognise" I will support the movement in any way I can.

Rio 2016 Olympics has been and gone

So, the excitement of the Rio Olympics has been and gone, and we revert back to our mundane lives again! No excuses for late nights or early morning, no exhilarating world records and brilliance, just old routines until the next one.

Like most Olympics, Rio did have it's problems, but by-and-large it ran smoothly. Although the weather gods didn't always cooperate.

There were, however, a couple of countries that continuously went out of their way to try and disrepute and spoil the game - the Yanks and the Aussies.

From the moment the Aussies landed there, they started their winging about the "uninhabitable" accommodation. Magically, within a matter of hours, a fairy waves her (or his, as the case may be!!) wand and it was transformed into great accommodation!!!

Within days they started their arrogant ways - this is the team that is one of the largest with the weakest returns! It's as if sending a large contingent (because you have money) makes you important and more important than the others. We started accusing other competitors as drug cheats. Now, most team managements would have had a team meeting and advised everyone to stop being idiots and antagonistic to others - this is a celebration not a war. But when it comes to sport, for the Aussies, it's always a war! And there are always our favourite enemies, the commies, the bow legged yellow skins and of course the Muslims. So the response of the administration was to come out brandishing their swords fully supporting this loutish behaviour on the basis of some weird theory of being "open"! So, in the Aussie perspective, being “open” gives you an open slather to insult opponents! But then - that's the Aussie way!

The loutish behaviour became unbearable when the idiot, Mack Horton, actually won a gold medal! Unfortunately for him, the rest of the world (apart from the Anglo-Celtic nations) will prefer to forget him and he will not really remain in the minds and definitely not in the hearts of people. Fortunately, the loutish behaviour at unbearable levels only lasts as long as the Aussies are performing well or before the competition actually commences. So in the case of the Olympics, in a matter of days, the poor performances usually curtail their behaviour for the rest of the games - phew!!!

Whilst we did win a battle or 2 we were demolished in the war. There were some interesting statistics which showed that the Aussies were winning a gold medal for every 17 members of the team while most of the other developed nations were for every 4-6! So, we merely had quantity, but not quality.

Whilst we were madly waging war against the bow legged yellow skins, the Yanks took on their arch rival - the Russians. So, long before the event even started, they, together with their clan, attempted to ban the Russians entirely. Fortunately their stranglehold of the OIC is fast diminishing and so a less unfair solution was negotiated. The Russians fared well, considering so many of their elite athletes were prevented from competing.

What's ironic, is that we keep harassing the Russian and Chinese teams about doping when there is no nation more into it than the Yanks themselves. We seem to use the term "State sponsored doping" as if doping was worse if it was sponsored by the state rather than multi-billion dollar companies and individuals. But that's a topic for another time! But what we shouldn't forget is that it was the US team that included the twice drug-cheat - pot calling the kettle white!

Then the two pariah nations combined their energies in to bringing disrepute to the Olympics. In some cases, it seems to have backfired. Not sure if the world thought badly of Rio or that buffoon Ryan "Brides maid" Lochte!

Let's leave the ugly side of the Olympics aside and celebrate the great achievements at the games.

“the games where African Americans blast through Barriers!”

This was the games where the African American's seem to have broken through the many barriers in areas other than track and field. The performances of Simone Biles in Gymnastics and Simone Manuel in the blue ribbon event at the pool, were incredible personal achievements but also, hopefully signs of greater liberation of African Americans in a nation that is becoming increasingly split along racial lines.

“Bolt shows the world how it should be done! – 3X3 the world screamed”

No drugs (we hope), no insults, no war – just pure human brilliance. This man is truly larger than life (in a literal and metaphorical sense) and unbeaten at the games. It was one for the record books and none more deserving.

The thing is that whilst the developed world may draw artificial lines differentiating legal vs.illegal performance enhancing activities, the truth is that from the moment they are conceived, they are advantaged by performance enhancing drugs, food, techniques – the whole lot. So when a Bolt arrives on the scene, with none of these benefits, it is truly remarkable.

“Fiji win their first ever Olympic gold medal!”

This was one of the magical moments of the Olympics. The joyful Fijian supporter displaying the colourful nature of their culture whilst willing their team to beat no other than their slave masters!

For me, the moment was spoiled by the team displaying the sign of the cross – a symbol of their enslavement. And this from one of the most colourful cultures. I could not help but think of the rich tapestry of colourful gods that have been destroyed to make way for the “almighty” but boring, corrupt, abusive Christian god.

Once again, in a Bolt like fashion, these humble talented group of athletes, defied all the hurdles thrown at them and thrashed the over-privileged nations at their own game -rugby. All the “legal” performance enhancing drugs and techniques could not defeat this amazing team.

And then the ultimate humiliation – they knelt as they received their medals! There masters somehow managed to crush them back a few centuries!

There were many other glorious moments which deserve a mention, but I will never complete this blog entry (It’s already been about 5 weeks since I started), if attempted to include them here.

So, for another 4 years, lets keep some of the memories and just a few, for the rest of our lives!

Stuff Rio–the Sydney International Piano Competition is upon us!

OK, it’s been and gone and so some of us are in the depths of withdrawal and may remain such for another long four years!

The first time I involved myself in this event was either in 1988 or 1992. The event was of a much smaller scale and the competitors of lesser quality (considering it only began in 1976). It was still an exhibition of the brilliance and the exuberance of youth. I popped into the Conservatorium on several days through-out the competition and as I recall, the awards night and final performances were at the town hall.

For various reasons, I have not really followed the event since. But this year, my brother emailed me a month or so before and so I decided to spend sometime there and aren’t I glad I did!

I happened to be in the city on one of the Semi-finals sessions. Whilst I had some problems with booking tickets online, I was able to purchase them at the Conservatorium. The Conservatorium itself had changed significantly since I was there, last.

While in the queue for tickets, I spoke with a lady who was here from Adelaide. She was one of the many volunteers and was rewarded with some concessions for the session. She was regretting that she was heading back before the finals! Many of the others were regretting the same or that they hadn’t come earlier! No doubt the competition was addictive and there were music lovers here from all parts of Australia. What’s not addictive about a group of young enthusiastic musicians – the future of their profession.

Near the foyer, there was an exhibition of pianos and several people were taking the opportunity to play on some of the best pianos in the world! Including some kids who thumped and banged on the keys with utter delight while their adoring mums encouraged them! But there were some brilliant passages of music being played as well.

I was early, so I decided I would go down to the area and have a closer look (yes, the thumping kids and their adoring mums had moved on!!). There were several youth pianists there, probably students from the Conservatorium but there was also an fairly elderly Asian pianist playing some incredible passages, including some from the Liszt Piano concerto.

I sat there and enjoyed the many refrains coming from all sides!

Closer to the time of the competition session, I entered the auditorium. Shortly after, a tall, elegant young lady with “big red hair” (sorry, but that’s the only way to describe it) sat next to me. I had noticed her earlier in the foyer (it was impossible not to!). Several others came and congratulated her and told her that they thought she deserved to be in the Semi-finals. So, she clearly was one of the Australian competitors.

I politely made conversation with her by asking if she was competing and congratulating her on being selected. I then asked her if she had anyone that she was “following”! She mentioned Oxana Shevchenko. I asked why? and she gave me a good youth feminist answer – “she’s the only female in the semi-final”! Ok, but if you took away the gender based biases, who did you find impressive? She said, Oxana was pretty good anyway and judging by some of the comments I heard from others, she obviously was. But she also told me that she really hadn’t had much time to listen to the other competitors and this was really the first time she was attending the sessions. Considering she was participating in the previous rounds, I could well understand that.

As I left the auditorium during the break, I noticed a board with photographs of all the competitors and identified the young lady as Ayesha Gough (winner of the Lev Vlassenko Piano competition 2015). It’s brilliant to see young Aussies playing at that level.

The session I saw included 3 semi finalists – Kenneth Broburg (US), Gyu Tae Ha(Korea) and Arseny Tarasevich-Nikolaev (Russia). Each performing for over an hour! I found Broburg rather mundane. Ayesha had also mentioned the name of Ha as brilliant and very young! His performance was stylish and he finished off quite brilliantly. But undoubtedly, my favourite was Nokolaev. His performance included my two most favourite composers of piano music, Chopin and Rachmaninov and was masterful, controlled and overflowing with brilliance. It was his performance that continued my interest in the competition.

I was eager to find out the results several days later (as round 2 of the semi-finals which included accompaniment was over a few days and it didn’t really interest me), and was pleasantly surprised to see that both Broburg and Nikolaev had made it in to the finals. I was disappointed that Ha hadn’t and couldn’t help but think that politics probably gets in the way of these judgements. For instance, having to 2 Russians, 2 Chinese and no Yanks – not acceptable. Having no women was probably not acceptable either! Ha was much younger than the rest and so has probably got plenty of time to shine (although this should not have been taken into account). To add to that, the judges had seen the previous rounds as well and could make a more holistic judgement. Regardless, I was sure that the stage was set for a great final.

The Final was scheduled over 4 days. Round one was over the first 2 days and included 18th century concerto and a few days later, round 2 a 19th or 20th century concerto.

For the first time, the competition was streamed over the internet. This was a great offering by the organisers. It meant that a much larger global audience could enjoy the event.

I missed the first day of round 1. But on the second day watched both the Chinese contestants Moye Chen and Jianing Kong and Oxana Shevchenko. All six contestants played Mozart in round 1. Not surprisingly both Chen and Kong had silky smooth techniques with amazing control. Whilst I do enjoy Mozart, it doesn’t move me as much as the Romantic and Impressionist periods. I had now seen 5 of the 6 finalist and still had a preference for Nikolaev, although I did think the Chinese contestants were going to be great challengers.

Round 2 finally arrived – this was my passion. 2 contestants played Prokofiev No 2, one Saint-Saens No. 2, one Brahms No. 2 and 2 Rachmaninov's No. 2. Day one had Broberg, Nikolaev and Gugnin playing Saint-Saens, Rachmaninov and Prokofiev respectively.

Broberg gave a solid performance, but not a moving one. In an interview later, he said that his choice of concerto was more due to a mis-match between the eligible items and his repertoire.

New was Nikolaev playing Rachmaninov, which was for me the performance of the finals. Finally Gugnin played the Prokofiev, which was impressive to watch, but Prokofiev rarely moves me.There is no doubt he played it well.

Day 2 had  Oxana playing Prokofiev, Chen playing Rachmaninov and Kong playing Brahms. Oxana was clearly the hosts of the streaming and the other commentators favourite. Unfortunately she apparently completely messed up a page or so in one of the movements. I’m not sure how anyone would have known(!!) as it all seemed like the orchestra was still tuning and the piano was bashing away numerous notes – physically extremely demanding, I would think!

Then came Chen, whose performance of Rachmaninov was faultless but too me didn’t quite match Nikolaev – I guess it’s hard to beat a Russian playing a Russian! Finally we had Kong take on the ginormous task of Brahms No.2. I was not familiar with the work, but he played it brilliantly all the way!

To me, the result was going to be between Nikolaev, Chen and Kong. Mostly because I just didn’t care for the Prokofiev and the Saint Saens was quite ordinary. And still it was Nikolaev for me!

The streaming had a host and two other guest commentators to fill in the time between performances. One of whom was an totally obnoxious individual by the name of Gerard Willems. The pompous ass decided that the reason some of the audience applauded between movements was because they had never been to a concert!!! In the same breath he mentioned a concert that he had been in where the same thing happened! The idiot didn’t even realise that he was contradicting himself.

I’ve been to many concerts in many parts of the world where concert goers, in their enthusiasm, applaud between movements. In fact, there are certain pieces of music where the first movements have such grandioso endings that consistently audiences applaud – this Gerard clown was talking through his pompous ass!

Let’s leave the pompous ass and get back to the good stuff! It was now time for the results. I couldn’t but think that the brilliance was over and now it was time for the politics. Would the Chinese pianists get a fair hearing (pardon)!

Finally the results were announced. Gugnin won the competition, Nikolaev 2nd and Chen 3rd.The last time I attended the competition the competition was between a Chinese and a German (I don’t recall the names). That time, I preferred the passion of the German over the technical brilliance and smoothness of the Chinese player, but the Judges opted for the Chinese player. Although, he then performed Chopin’s Barcarolle in F sharp major to perfection at the winner’s concert, justifying the judges decision and it have ever since been one of my favourite pieces of music for piano.

So, once again my favourite had come second. There was no encore or winners concert so it was suddenly all over! What had been for me a wonderful week and a bit had now come to an abrupt end and it would be another 4 long years before I would enjoy such a wonderful event back in Sydney. This gathering of brilliance will now disperse – in fact some had left already but they will leave their mark in Sydney forever and least in the minds of some of us. Hopefully we will continue to hear their music and hear of their many future accomplishment.

I wish them all well!

Watch out folks!! The Russians are coming

There are so many interesting news items right now eg. juvenile detention of indigenous kids, Gassing babies, the American elections, the Sydney Piano Competition (I soooo wanna write something on that! Oh! dominated by the Russians and Chinese, I should add!). But the one I thought to be highest priority was the whole corrupt effort of the Western nations to ban the Russians from the Olympics. The media will drum all those other issues to death as will they with this story. However, they will all take an anti-Russian stance. It’s quite normal for Western media to go hysterical and lose any sense of logic when it comes to dealing with issues relating to Russia (or China for that matter).

It’s hard to fathom why this is the case, is it the Cold war (that ended 30 years ago), is it their intense dislike for Putin (Domestically, one of the most popular leaders of that country), is it the terror of communism (long gone) one can only guess. It is more likely due to  a fear and realisation that the new world order – BRICS – is becoming a reality with every day that goes by.

The band wagon to ban the Russians was lead by the usual culprits – the English (Seb Coe), the Americans and a few others. And when it comes to the commie bastards, no legal framework is required, just dumb propaganda.

The case for banning Russians is extremely weak. It is based on a disgruntled whistle-blower and some still to be proven report by a serf of the group. Really wouldn’t  stand up in any court and is simply hear say. The last time the coalition of the willing used a disgruntled whistle blower was when they wanted to massacre a few million people in Iraq. One thing you can be completely confident about is that when dealing with the Anglo-Celtic coalition (The GusWhiSUCs or Sucs in short) everything they say will be a complete fabrication and they will use their sophisticated (and sometimes not so sophisticated) propaganda machines to suggest that their opponents are lying or cannot be trusted. And of course, the gullible plebs are true believers.

The easiest way to win medals at the Olympics (and winning has become commercially critical to these nations) is to eliminate the strongest rivals – remember the Aussie Ice skater Steven Bradbury. Historically the Russians have been one of the stronger teams at the Olympics. By banning them there are more medals for your own athletes and its a great boost to the national ego. I just heard that by banning the Russian women’s rowing eights, the Aussie team has been given a place – you see, it’s all self-interest.

The Sucs’ media has never been able to conduct a structured analysis of any of it’s “opponents” (let alone the Russians or Chinese) – it just turns into a hysterical barrage of propaganda.

When it comes to doping in sport, there is no bigger offender than the US. That is if you consider the number of competitors that get caught. But that is simply the tip of the iceberg. The US also has the most sophisticated drug program and are therefore least likely to get caught. Besides that the commercial benefit of winning medals is so great that there is no incentive for the authorities to clamp down on it. It is far more beneficial  to go harassing the less sophisticated drug programs in Russia and China.

Of course the biggest losers are the third world countries. Not only are they unable to afford the legal performance enhancing techniques, they definitely do not have the wherewithal to run a clandestine doping program.

With the professionalisation and commercialisation (Coco Cola games) of the Olympics, there was never going to be any chance of setting an even remotely level playing field. The games has simply become a source for big corporates to create the resources for increasing their profits.Nevertheless, it is one of the greatest spectacles and a majority of us, (yours truly, included), adore the event.

The West has a track record (sorry!) for using the Olympics as a weapon against Russia. It’s either a boycott or ban of one sort or another. Remember when the Coalition of the willing boycotted the Moscow Olympics due to , guess what, an invasion of Afghanistan?!! Ummm… now doesn’t that sound familiar. But I don’t recall the Russians doing anything of the sort for the coalitions invasion of the very same country nor the war crime that is the Iraq war.

See, the Russians are just a bit more mature and not into the sabre rattling that is required by the Western leaders to keep their own electorates happy.

The Sucs use the phrase “State sponsored” doping to differentiate themselves from the former communist nations. This is done not purely when it comes to doping, but also anything else, due to the nature of centralised planning. So, when some rebel group fire a missile at a commercial flight flying within a war zone by accident, it is Russia committing a crime! On the other hand when the Sucs commit atrocities such as bombing innocent villages in Syria or blasting a whole nation on a fabricated lie, it is merely collateral damage. And I won’t even touch on the atrocities of Israel!

No Suc has ever been charged or executed for war crimes, even though the Iraq war was an illegal invasion of another country.

Country	Medals returned
United States	11
Russia	4
China	1

Olympic Medals returned due to doping

So why do we keep wanting to ban Russia and China?! The thing is that the evidence would suggest to any logical individual that we should be banning a whole different set of nations.

The Americans hide behind an excuse that the doping is conducted by individuals and the State has no involvement. But it is this very excuse that encourages it. We all know that if the US wanted to reduce it, they could very well do it. And taking it a step further, if the IOC banned the Americans for one Olympics for doping (rather than illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and other atrocities) then the games would be so much more cleaner.

The Sucs continued obsession to bully Russia and China is clearly related to the emergence of the New world order. As their (the Sucs) relevance decreases their attempts to bully their new masters increases. The change in power structure was evident in the IOC’s decision to stand by Russia and snub the SUCS. This is something that would never have happened 10 years ago or even 5!

The Sucs do not see the individual athletes of these nations as humans who have dedicated a life time to achieve their dreams and hopes of competing at the Olympics. They see them as an enemy to be squashed, somehow.

This was evident when the Turks (supposedly, more likely to have been the Yanks) shot down a Russian aircraft in Syria. The whole Western world gathered behind the Turks in support. This was clearly an act of aggression, where there was no danger what-so-ever. Whilst there would have been a father, mother, wife and children who mourned their loss, the West simply saw it as collateral damage! Just as they have no remorse for the millions of Iraqi’s they have murdered nor the chaos created in Iraq and Syria (or the entire middle East and Muslim world).

Lieutenant colonel Peshkov was murdered while he was parachuting or shortly after – an act violating the Geneva convention. An Act performed by Turkmen rebel fighters lead by a Turk. So, I guess it was a war crime of Turkey (using the logic of the Sucs in relation to Ukraine and flight MH17) or stretching the logic a bit further, NATO and the Yanks. Is anyone screaming for justice?!

So, America might once again win a great many medals at the games, but one should be suspicious of every single medal they win, rather than bashing the communists!

Turnbull to TurnBullShit–the complete transformation

Note: I started this entry a couple of weeks prior to the elections. Unfortunately, I was unable to complete it until several weeks after!

Close to 10 years ago, a couple of years after Malcolm entered politics, I sheepishly admit that, I thought he would be a visionary leader for this country. He was truly progressive and liberal (not conservative). But he faced a dilemma. Here was a rich white man, who naturally would be assumed to have conservative views but instead had progressive views.So just as he could have very well fitted in either camp (i.e.. Labor or Liberal) he equally didn’t fit in neither! Malcolm chose the Fiberal party although his beliefs were more in line with the Labor party.

Malcolm’s Hockey like ambition to be Prime Minister to stroke his own ego was always a concern (one should always be suspicious about these ambitious jokers who want to be PM for the sake of being PM) and there was also the issue that he was not electable by the Australian public, who typically hate tall poppies and distrust rich arrogant men with egos that couldn’t fit in the parliament house in Canberra!

Malcolm stood fast with his beliefs for many years. At first, because he felt that was his best chance for leadership of the party. He maintained he views after he killed Brendan Nelson – collateral damage one might say – on the march to his objective. It was when he was dumped by the party that political reality began to hit. This was a spoiled brat who got his way in most scenarios and had just had his pant dropped and whooped by his party.

He dragged his sore bottom to the backbenches and embarked in Rudd like passive resistance. This was good political training for the brat! During this period, it was in his interest, as passive resistor, to maintain some of his progressive views on climate change and SSM to remain popular with the public and make a fool of the mad hatter Abbott. But when he struck the final blow to the Mad Phoney Abbott, that was when he knew he had to do whatever it took to be the PM – his ambition! His stars were aligned as the unelectable Turnbull had achieved his goal without having to be elected.

. . . the transformation had begun.

His performance at a recent Q&A displayed his elitism and the extent to which he had embraced the Fiberal culture. Malcolm had morphed– from Turnbull to TurnBullShit.

He was now the specialist in the Fiberal party’s skill of simply fabricating and lying about everything. Ever since Howard, the truth has always been irrelevant to the Fiberals and the Aussie public seem to accept that but castigate the Labor party. The media seem nervous to tackle Malcolm because of his ill-founded reputation of a brilliant business man!

Let’s breakdown Malcolm’s performance at Q&A and it’s quite breathtaking how he was able to Spin so much in so little time.

Border Control

Border control has always been seen as a strong point for the Fiberals. To give them credit they have always had the courage to be more inhumane to refugee seekers and in this particular instance, take what is really an insignificant issue, build it into something that the more racist Aussie plebs find important and emotive and make it an election winner.

On-water operations - Are you sure there were no boats?!!

There is little doubt that the Rudd’s initial position increased the number of boats. The Labor party, despite it’s inner principle’s had to give into the strong Aussie public racist sentiment and change their position. Apart from the turning back boats aspect, it was the Labor party that introduced the current regime and what is even more important and often forgotten – the boats had pretty much stopped before the Fiberals came into power. I guess, it was pointless the Labor party attempting to “labour” (sorry) this point, when they opened the flood gates to begin with.

The big fib it appears to be, is the grand statement that there have not been any boats for six hundred odd days. It now appears that there have been over 20, which have been turned around – those are the boats that the government has been willing to tell us about.

The “we don’t discuss on-water operational matters” shield was no different to a Nazi, Communist or dictatorship regime type action to remove any accountability.

Whenever a government decides to hide something from it’s people, it is due to it being involved in an activity that the majority of Australians would not want to put their name to.

The thing is, the Fiberals discovered that the average dumb Aussie voter, is gullible, racist and really does not care what we do to stop the boats. Cos the illiterate boat people are after their jobs!

Climate Change

Climate change is where Malcolm’s desire to be PM over principle’s shows best. In true Liberal (not Fiberal) spirit, he supported market based emission scheme. He lost the leadership over this when he wanted to support Labor. But now he seems to suggest that he supports the Direct (no) Action approach of the mad Abbott! One that has increased Australia’s emission and made us the worlds pariah’s on this matter.

Climate change flip flop!

Malcolm’s suggestion that Obama thanked him for his position is mastery in spin. Malcolm had only just assassinated the Abbott and really had no time what so ever to have any policy discussion before Paris. He didn’t want to be totally snubbed by the other leaders who saw Australia’s position under Abbott as backward and stupid. So he cobbled together a target (nothing else) and took it to Paris.

Of course Obama was going to thank him for some improvement and in any case, Obama would have thanked everyone there for the level of cooperation. This was absolute spin mastery. And the dumb Aussie public felt all warm and fuzzy about the compliments of the US president and swallowed the spin in glee!

The so called “Economic Plan”

The Great Economic Plan–a mere tax cut!

The strategy of the Malcolm’s advisers has clearly been to make him appear the successful corporate business man leading a party that is professional and business like! And so the election ads which looked like IBM or BHP corporate ads. The 5 point slide presentations etc.

But this grand “Economic Plan” just materialised over night! The dumb Aussie public, once again bought into it hook line and sinker. One didn’t have to scratch the surface much to realise that there was no plan what-so-ever. The reference to the budget papers over and over again was evidence of this. A budget is a budget but a plan required a whole lot more strategic thinking planning. A budget is not an Economic Plan, STUUUPEEED!!!

The “Economic plan” was no more that a tax cut for large corporates. Malcolm sold it well.

Medical costs

Malcolm’s statements on this were complete lies or if you wanted to be generous, simply wrong! With inflation and population growth, the is no doubt that bulk billing will be higher and continue to grow. Not something that Malcolm can claim credit for. His policy is quite different – the plan is to stop increasing the scheduled rates. Naturally, this will have an impact on doctors and there ability to continue bulk billing.

So, no cuts to Medical services?!!

Malcolm has obviously never been bulk billed. There is complete confusion about the GP co-payment. A search on the internet will give you different views on whether a bulk billing doctor should charge the co-payment and if so is it in fact being bulk-billed. Do the doctors who bulk bill have to absorb $5.00 or do they charge the additional $7.50 and end up not bulk billing?!

Getting more competition in the medical industry is a good thing. Increasing the supply is as well – something that the AMA have tirelessly prevented to maintain a closed shop. However, suggesting to the public that reducing the government contribution to doctors will not end up with increased cost to the patient is fantasy.

Medicare, Mediscare!

The Fiberals clearly got caught out on this one. What has resulted is that they now cannot privatise even sensible sections of it! Well, not that their election rhetoric has ever constrained them. If Labor didn’t call this out, we would have had quite a different Malcolm after the election.

Medicare Mediscare!

Outsourcing Medicare as a whole would be quite difficult. The government would have to pay a high premium to get any organisation to take the risk and the funding model would be complex. But by privatising it, the government would be able to reward the service provider for reducing payments – and we all know what will happen there.

The thought of Aussies attempting to put together a modern IT system, is hilarious– let alone a bunch of public servants! It will cost 10 times more than it should and take 3 times as long for half the services (Don’t I know it, just take the Customer Management System ($80m) and website ($23m) solution at Sydney Water!! – that’s another story altogether).

The Fiberal DNA is survival of the fittest and efficiency. There is no place for the sick in such a world – they are inefficient and a burden on society! Why should the rich pay to keep ‘em alive?!! They reluctantly play ball, as otherwise they would lose votes.

The 2 tier NBN

Malcolm attempts portray this image that he is big on innovation and technology. People tend to get confused between a man who made money on a speculatory investment, with someone who is a progressive advocate for technology. They are confused because the Fiberals push this message.

2 tier NBN–one for Rich,Fat, White Men and another for plebs

The form on the NBN is a clear indication of the Fiberal values. We now are spending pretty much the same amount on the NBN as Labor proposed (admittedly, there might have been some increases there too, but less likely, as it was all new and not dependent on assumptions made about the existing network.), and sinking large amounts of funds (close to half the overall costs) on 19th (yes, 19th Century, not 20th or 21st) century technology – copper.

If you are rich, you can pay extra and get the fibre to you resident – tier 1 (Rich, Fat, White man’s version). If not, you get the copper version – tier 2 (Pleb’s version). Malcolm himself says that 85% chose the copper version and received 20Mb connections. The reality is that the old technology ADSL pretty much reached those speeds anyway. And so we have the great waste – an investment of $70b, half of which is on 19th century technology, simply to provide a service that is no better than what most of us have already.

So much for the great technology revolution.

No doubt the Fiberal spin will be that 85% purchasing the pleb version is clear evidence that that is all that is required – supply meeting demand. The reality is that most of them could not afford anything else.

His grand comparison with Labor’s delivery record is simply grandstanding. Anyone with any intellect would know that it is complex to plan these large infrastructure projects. Even in delivery, there is a large learning curve. The hard bits were done by the Labor party. Now they simply have to deliver it using tried and tested approaches. They bloody well should be delivering much larger numbers – you are in the delivery phase – STUUUPEEEEED!!!

The NBN investment is much like building a 2 lane harbour bridge, because there wasn’t many vehicles on the road at the time! Thank heavens that decision was made by more progressive thinking individuals that the current mob.

4k movies are already upon us – but that’s only for the Rich Fat White men. The rest can do without! Malcolm is full of contradictions on this one!

Same Sex Discord!

This is one of the biggest cock-ups of the election. However, it is one that the Aussie public is not particularly interested in. The selfish nature of the average dumb Aussie, ensures that the only reason they would have any interest in the LGBT group is to discriminate against them such that they have a competitive advantage – like racism, really.

The wasteful plebiscite!

The Phoney Abbott tactic to postpone any decision by the Fiberals, who are completely in disarray on this issue, has even got Malcolm flustered. He is suddenly a “leader but not a dictator”!

For some reason, he thinks that Australian are capable of a civilised discussion on this! When has Australia had a discussion on anything, let alone a civilised one. The level of “civilised” discussion taking place within the liberal party itself – bestiality etc. – is fuel for his confidence! Yours truly thinks that Shorten has a much better perspective of the path that this discussion will take.

It seems that he has already reneged on his promise to have the plebiscite by the end of the year – Surprise, Surprise!!

The greatest revolution in taxation in Australia’s history!

All that, and it fizzled out to be simply “a moment of clarity”! This is wonderful spin. The states pointed out the stupidity of the plan. The moment of clarity was that your revolution was really a hurried thought bubble, much like your predecessor – the mad Abbott’s

The greatest tax revolution?!!

Clearly a lower tax environment help making our companies more competitive globally. The problem is that our companies that operate overseas simply dig dirt and they have an incredibly good environment to make money. The other companies that operate here simply take all the profits overseas. That is the reason for the Treasury giving such low rates of return on the massive tax payer investment in his “mates” companies.

If one believes in the trickle down theory, that is mostly canvassed by the Fiberals, then due to the goodwill of the rich, the poor will get some of the spoils. But the reality is that reducing company tax benefits high income earners at the expense of low.

Keating may very well have been the “biggest reducer of company tax” but what you failed to mention (and strongly stated by Keating a few days later) was that Keating implemented a series of changes with it, to compensate the low income earners – a group of people who are not getting anything from your supposedly fair policies.

You have to say that Malcolm did tremendously well to squeeze in soo much TurnBullShit in such a short time – and I’ve only picked some of it!

Ultimately, Australia voted the TurnBullShit back into power and so we will have to delve in it knee deep, for the next 3 years.

A great Fiberal tradition

In the aftermath of Brexit, I’m told, that the phrase most googled in Britain was “What is the EU”?!!! What is clear, is that the plebs of England, particularly the North, had no idea what the referendum was all about. Whilst it may seem rational to blame the “remain” side for not explaining it well enough to them, the reality is the economic rationale behind the EU is complex and it takes more that 3 word slogans to explain. The Northern plebs were never going to get it.

Further more, when the competition has no real argument other than appealing to the usual racism and border protection issues, with promises of power and glory, where being truth full is irrelevant, then, it becomes quite a challenge. Yes, the trick is to somehow relate any subject with migration and any other race and the plebs will be with you.

Over the last 20 years, it has become apparent that the right side of politics appears to have a license to lie and the left don’t. It’s not to say the left doesn’t, but in Australia, there is a complete imbalance in terms of the level of Fibs stated by each party and the repercussions.

Ever since Howard, the Fiberals have become masters of lying. When, the reward for lying is winning elections over and over again, then, it is not surprising that the Fiberals are somewhat addicted to it.

Some would say that this is smart politics. The left attempts to explain complex issues to the plebs, with limited success. The right recognise that no amount of explaining will educate the plebs, they simply accept them as dumb – they are the equivalent of those who were baffled and went looking for cake when Antoinette made her infamous comment – “Let them eat cake”!  . And so simple three word slogans that appeal to the pleb’s inner sense of security, is the Fiberal’s response. The truth is irrelevant – the plebs are too dumb to be explained the truth or to find out, and the pleb media will keep them ignorant.

What’s brilliant about this strategy is that now not only were they guaranteed the far right vote of the conservatives and wealthy, but they also hit the poorest and dumbest mob, who traditionally were the Labor heartland. Ironically, it is exactly for this reason that the Fibs would like to keep those dumb plebs just as they are – dumb plebs. Its good for their businesses and good to maintain power.

Lets look at the form of some of the “Great” fiberal leaders.

The bumbling Howard.

This is an irrelevant ole’ man who still can’t accept that his adventure in Iraq was a mistake and he lied through his teeth to the Australian public. As I say – Whilst is maybe possible to miss evidence of something that does exist, it’s pretty impossible to find it for something that does not! This poor soul is desperately attempting to create a legacy that will never exist.

We all recall the “Howard battlers”. These were the dumb Aussie plebs, mostly racist and completely ignorant. While it might appear that the supporters of the right were wealthy, it was Howard that realised the opportunity to completely exploit this dumb mob and hence started the phenomenon of feeding the plebs with bullshit simple messages that appeal to their DNA – white supremacy, racism etc.

So, we had the Tampa, Children overboard and the Iraq war. Howard won 3 elections purely on the basis of these events which he manipulated into racism and white supremacy appealing to his battlers. He set the standard for Fiberal politics and what a great tradition it has become.

The Mad Abbott

Perhaps due to his religious beliefs, the mad Phoney Abbott just could not differentiate between fact and fiction. But he did master the 3 word slogan. We all remember “Ditch the Bitch” and the Gillard lie. But surprisingly we don’t seem to remember the string of lies that the mad Abbott said. It’s almost as if we still hold Labor accountable but we don’t expect anything but lies from the Fiberals.

There was hardly a word of truth that was uttered by the mad Abbott. The budgets reflected nothing of his promises and he lied to us about stopping the boats. It now appears that the boats kept coming but we simply turned them back – all 29 of them.

The dumb Aussie public and media simply bought in to the secrecy surrounding “on-water operational matters”! We love to be critical of foreign governments who dupe their people, but we were quite happy to accept the Fiberals on this matter. When a Government in involved in covert operations, those that are kept secret from it’s public, one can be quite sure that they are up to no good. This was Putin like behaviour. The Labor party wouldn’t ever have dreamt of covert operations and if they did, with a little bit of pressure they would have made the information public.

Why the Aussie public and media are so accepting of the secrecy is baffling. I suspect it has something to do with feeling proud of a strong navy and the people on the boats were foreigners and even worse Muslims. It’s all relative, the Australia navy seem powerful in comparison to the little putt putt boats of the Indonesian fishermen!

Malcolm TurdBullShit and what was her name – the chic who  votes the same as him?!

Malcolm is a classic case of selling one’s soul to the devil. He entered politics with unadulterated views of the world and complete naivety of the political landscape. His first stint as the leader of his party brought him back to Earth. His attempt to work with Labor for the benefit of Australia on the climate front, was completely foreign to his party stooges and before long he fell flat on his bottom.

He clearly learned from that first experience and now, no one really knows who he is. Everything he stood for before he knifed Abbott now seems to have evaporated. Climate change, Same Sex marriage, a complete transformation. So we still have the mad Abbott policies, but no Abbott! and Malcolm TurnbullShit is just that – complete bull shit. He has lost his credibility.

There is the opportunity for a whole new blog on the TurnBullShit that Malcolm has been pouring on this dumb plebs – old ladies being hassled, an economic plan, Medicare not being privatised, the deficit is Labors fault, Labor has a big black whole even before Labor released it’s numbers. It’s the complete Fiberal package, with a tinge of corporate branding put to it.

When elections arrive, we leave our future in the hands of those dumb plebs who are still  in search of cake and to the three word slogans of the Fiberals. At least the Labor party might drag those dumb plebs out of their miserable existence. But no, the 3 word slogans are as far as they comprehend.