De-programming the Indoctrinated West . . . or do we let generational change fix it?

De-programming the indoctrinated West – or do we let generational change fix it?

If you asked a Westerner if they were indoctrinated the response is most likely going to be one of arrogant dismissal – it’s not the West but the rest that is indoctrinated. Sadly, the opposite reaction is likely if you asked the same question of the rest! They would think that their governments indulge in indoctrination unlike in the West. Both these responses are due to Western indoctrination at home and beyond.

The favourite weapon of the political goons of the West and their puppeteers – the Oligarchs – has been indoctrination. They have accused every “threat” or unfamiliar movement of this supposedly abominable activity, whilst indulging in it themselves, more so than any that they direct accusations at. So, in their narrative, we live in a world where everybody, but them, are indoctrinated in one form or another.

The key question is, why is it that the citizens of the West, and outside, accept this version of the world. How is it that the supposedly best educated populations of the world have fallen for this. Is it because it is correct, or, is it because they had the most sophisticated form of indoctrination known to mankind applied to them to begin with – the covert form of indoctrination which the victim is oblivious to.

There is little doubt that indoctrination occurs rampantly around the world but perhaps it was, in some instances, a necessary part of transformation, such as in China and many nations transitioning to communism (a new philosophy that people had no understanding of), or, a clumsy coercive force that backed with violence suppressed people. But regardless how it was used, it was never as effective nor sophisticated as Western techniques of indoctrination.

In the West, the controlling Oligarchs have seen many a transition through history. They survived the wave of “democracy” by giving the plebs elections - a periodical few weeks of feeling powerful before they buried their heads back in activities that enriched and empowered the Oligarchs whilst scrounging and quarrelling amongst themselves for the scraps of trickle-down benefits.

“As the state has control of the “education” curriculum from a very young age, there is little re-education or deprogramming required – they are dealing with a clean slate in young kids.”

But as the wealth extraction from the colonies were becoming more scares and problematic, the threat of a disgruntled pleb class continued to bubble up every now and then. This is where the Oligarchs colluded with the political goons they fund, to exploit indoctrination as a weapon of mass (as in the masses) destruction. The mainstream media have been the additional prong that has pandered to the Oligarchs and political goons in order to maintain privileged access and ensure they were seen as “patriots”.

Phases of Indoctrination

Western academics adopt several models for analysing Islamic resistance movements, who they convenient label as extreme Islamists, but rarely adopt these models to assess themselves. Indoctrination in the West is a far more sophisticated beast than in other parts of the world or any resistance movement. As the state has control of the “education” curriculum from a very young age, there is little re-education or deprogramming required – they are dealing with a clean slate in young kids.

Indoctrination of a “liberal” society is a multi-phase process.

1.      Build trust of citizens - Recruitment

The first step of indoctrinating your citizens is to make them believe that they are not, and their government would never part-take in such activities. Then, project on other “evil” nations (Russia, China and Iran) as the nations that indoctrinate. The relative trust that is built is the foundation to the success of later stages. It is relative and the focus is just as much on discrediting others as it is building trust in itself.

The West adopts patriotism, Judeo-Christianity and white supremacy as the core principles of this recruitment phase. These are very easily accomplishable outcomes in the West, which appeal to the tribal instincts of population. It is a group that has known nothing but white privilege, Islamophobia, crusaderism and Zionism, and, perhaps understandably, will not give-up those privileges and values voluntarily.

“The West adopts patriotism, Judeo-Christianity and white supremacy as the core principles of this recruitment phase.”

2.      The Bogey Man – Disorientation and deconstruction

Disorientation and deconstruction of normal human values take place in the form of the imaginary bogeyman always prevalent in Western democracies. The bogeyman took many forms from the “savages” of lands being conquered, to Islam, to Germany, to Russia, to communism, to China etc.

Religion was a major instrument for developing these “threats” and emotional alignments, including Islamophobia and crusaderism (Zionism).

3.      Build Alliances – Compliance and identification

The formation of alliances that are “like minded” or have “shared values” thereby strengthening the identity with no moral judgement of the values themselves. The creation of a cult mentality that supports the value set with no questioning. The created “identity” must be protected, no matter what.

4.      Consolidation – Internalising and refreezing.

Enforcement of the identity through binary constructs such as “with us or against us”, “us vs them”, “allies vs enemy”, “good vs evil” or “goodies vs badies”. Such constructs forming the basis for punishment for non-compliance.

The first step of indoctrinating your citizens is to make them believe that they are not!

The manifestation in the West

Whilst some form of indoctrination probably existed in all organised communities in the world including the West, the modern from of indoctrination is likely to have originated during the heights of colonisation. It was essential, if the colonials were to maintain any semblance of respectability amongst each other, considering the barbarism, carnage and genocides they were committing across the globe. This was at a time when information flow was slow, sketchy and miniscule at best and it did not take much to engineer the narrative and indoctrinate the public into believing that they were salvaging the savages of these regions, usually in the name of their god! In fact, the extremity of the savagery and barbarism inflicted by Europeans, rather than the indigenous people, is still being discovered centuries after they occurred. The plebs of these nations were too busy making ends meet to care about the atrocities being carried out in their name – they just enjoyed the spoils of colonisation.

“These were the times when racist bigots the likes of Churchill were heralded and glorified in Europe.”

With the European wars (wrongly referred to as world wars – these were primarily wars amongst the Europeans using their slaves from the colonies as cannon fodder.), indoctrination shifted to a whole new level. Information flow and literacy levels had improved in Europe and perhaps the intellect. So, indoctrination was even more critical although more challenging. So, we had the demonisation of Nazi’s, communism, the Japanese and of course the continuation of Islamophobia. These were the times when racist bigots the likes of Churchill were heralded and glorified in Europe. The “Allied” forces built a myth that it was the Germans who had the more advanced propaganda machine. But this, itself, was part of the Allies’ propaganda, which was a tried and tested machine with global reach that was centuries old.

The West’s indoctrination influenced most of the globe towards the middle of the 20^th century as the British control of the Anglo empire was crumbling. The boomers who grew up at that period, had some of the most repugnant perspectives of the world. But there were cracks showing in the system.

The final dismantling of the system arrived with social media and the availability of limitless information and its sources with the growth of independent media – Governments no longer had control of the narrative. Gen Z was the first to be liberated of this indoctrination. This together with the movement of people and greater interaction made it a much harder exercise to sell messages of Islamophobia, Zionism or savagery in South America or Africa - Gen Z simply would have none of it.

We now live in a period of transition with the explosive mix of a majority being Gen Z and younger, but the controlling political goons are predominantly relics from the boomers. In the US we see a systematic wipe-out of boomers in flights and, I suspect, this will be the trajectory in Europe over the next decade or so.

So, what are some of the worst untruths?

The messaging changed over the centuries due to the need of Western Oligarchs and governments (the useful idiots of the Oligarchs).

Colonial era

Being warring tribes, the Europeans never said no to a good ole’ war. They waged war against each other for centuries and then discovered ships which then diverted their attention from each other to the easier conquests on weaker people across the globe. Colonialism was in full swing and the atrocities committed were unparalleled in human history. So, the narratives were geared towards normalising genocides.

·        Terra Nullius – a land with no people.

A common claim used to legalise the acquisition of land and hide the genocidal activity that enabled it. Notably, this is a phrase that was included in the Australian constitution – a reflection of the need to cleanse themselves of the hideous genocide that was taking place. To this date the incidents have not been fully identified and there is little interest in doing so. It is estimated the 90% of indigenous people were murdered (a population of over 1 million to 100k).

·        One god – salvation of all people!

A principle widely used to label indigenous people as pagans or inhuman beasts. An essential “belief” that enabled recruitment of forces and justified atrocities and mass extermination. The forced conversion of indigenous people was positioned as “salvation” and the enforcers were “spreading god’s message” – so everyone was a winner!!

The “one god” motif, whilst seemingly harmless, had disastrous implications to indigenous people and destroyed the rich tapestry of culture around the globe – the extent of which is deserving of a blog of its own.

Great European war era

After murdering people across the world including each other, the so called, World wars, brought the wars back to Europe. Primarily a squabble about the division of the spoils across the world. No surprisingly the propaganda was directed at demonising other European nations and in particular, Germany. The inception of communism and its spread in Russia were seen as a threat and therefore a secondary target at first and post war became the primary target.

·        Evil NAZIs

The Nazis were a nationalist socialist party that swept into power during a period of extreme austerity inflicted by the Allied nations after Germany’s defeat in WWI. Needless to say the anti-German sentiment was extreme. The extent that it was democratic is debatable and one would be naïve to expect an accurate reflection of it anywhere. There were several elections and referenda conducted, but, as usual, the “West” would discredit it as part of their demonisation – we see the exact situation now, with Russia, China and Iran.

The Nazis may not have been angels but they were no worse than Churchill, who was the warmongering extraordinaire - single handedly starting 2 wars and losing, not merely both of them, but a whole empire, only to be rescued by others.

“Europe was able to cleanse themselves of anti-European jew by pinning it all on Germany . . .”

Europe was able to cleanse themselves of anti-European jew by pinning it all on Germany when, in reality, it was far worse in other parts of Europe. We shouldn’t forget that London was one of the few regions that banned Jews altogether.

·        6M Jews were murdered

The opportunistic Zionists realised that there was no better moment for them to make their claim for a nation of their own. It was essential that the European Jew predicament was exaggerated and leveraged to maximum effect. The level of exaggeration was no less than we experienced, firsthand, with the 40 beheaded babies – there were none. There was one dead child who was incinerated by IGF tank fire. There is little doubt that the Germans who were struggling to feed their own, decided to reduce the number of Jews that were seen as a burden to them. But concentration camps of Jews existed before the Nazi’s and the Russians suffered far more casualties than did the Jews, in those very camps. It is quite hard to gather information on the actual numbers, but there is census information which shows a limited reduction in the number of jews, after the war.

·        The US and UK defeated Germany WWII

This is an indoctrination that still is live and well. In reality, we know that it was Russia/USSR that demolished the German military, at great cost to themselves. But due to the anti-communist narrative that was also strong at the time, the message that reached the European and Yanky plebs was that it was their great victory!

Post European war era

The period immediately after the war concentrated primarily on communism and the Zionist settler colony project in Palestine – “Israel”.

·        Reds under the bed

The European Oligarchs had watched the dynasties crumble in Russia and China and were terrified that the same would occur in their fiefdoms. It was essential to demonise and even ban communism from the pleb as this would lead to another level of losing their powers to the plebs. Even though communism, despite the consolidated efforts of the wealthier Europeans to destroy them, was raising the poorest of humanity out of poverty. First Russia, one of the poorest nations in Europe, became the second most powerful nation within 2 to 3 decades. More recently we’ve seen the meteoric rise of China.

Ironically, the West demonises communism, whilst adopting most of its philosophy under the label of “socialism” or, in the US, “liberalism”. “Free education for all”, “free healthcare for all”, “equality for all” are all communist ideology. Every “progressive” step that the West takes is a step away from the Oligarchy and towards communism. However, the most crucial and the core of communism – central planning – is a step too far for the Oligarchs. That would be complete submission and relinquish power to the plebs. Unfortunately, it is the inability for strategic planning that has handicapped the West in its contest against China.

·        A land with no people for a people with no land.

This was the narrative propagated by the mostly Jewish oligarch in promoting and establishing the European jew colony in Palestine. The hatred of jews was universal and the Europeans wanted them out. Of course, in reality, there were people there, the Palestinians, and the Jews had land in Europe. But this was an easy sell as Islamophobia and crusaderism were well ingrained in the population already, so it didn’t take much to add the “Arabs are sub-human” component to it which was sufficient to make the Western populations feel good about themselves even though they were well aware of the atrocities being committed.

“This was the time that the term “antisemitism” came into being. Ironically, it conflated European jews, who were more likely to have DNA that was closer matched to NAZIs than actual Semites – the Palestinians.”

·        Conflation of Semites with European jews – antisemitism.

This was the time that the term “antisemitism” came into being. Ironically, it conflated European jews, who were more likely to have DNA that was closer matched to NAZIs than actual Semites – the Palestinians. But the ignorant European plebs were never to know that and mostly still don’t. This was an important narrative as it linked the Europeans to the Levant – the land that was being claimed based on some clause in a batshit crazy “book”. A NAZI claim on the Levant simply wouldn’t have had the same impact. The European political goons supported this as long as it got the jews off their backs.

·        Israel has a right to exist

This is one of my favourites. It is the unchallenged starting point of any discussion on the settler colony. Whilst no-one knows why. Perhaps it is the ambiguous statement of millennia ago in a batshit crazy bible or is it the all-Western controlled UN resolution that defines its existence on the basis of several pre-requisites – none of which has materialised. Neither of which stand the pub test but remain unchallenged in the West. No, Israel does not have a right to exist – Palestine does.

·        Israel is the only democracy in the region

Israel is an ethnocentric apartheid nation and is no democracy. Egypt and, in particular, Iran, have better functioning democracies than the European colony. Perhaps Iran, like China, has a better functioning democracy that selects the best of leaders who are far superior to those that are churned out by the Western systems. Try matching a Bush, Trump, Biden, Starmer, that clown Boris, Mertz, Macron with a Khamenei, Dr. Pezeshkian, Dr. Araghchi or Xi – Salesmen vs powerhouses, incomparable.

Figure 1Who are the real terrorists?

·        Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organisations.

Classifying organisations as terrorists is the playbook the West resorted to whenever needing to demonise a group that resisted it. ANC, PLO, IRA, Vietcong, you name it. This gave them the right to commit heinous atrocities against them and the people they represented (regardless of legality), and ban domestic protests against these atrocities.

·        They hate us because they hate our freedom.

This was the narrative after the 9/11 disaster. The answer to the question “why do they hate us so much” was never, you created chaos in their region and destroyed millions of lives, was never the answer. The West has never taken accountability nor reflected on the carnage they cause across the world simply for profit.

The current day narrative

The current day indoctrination, although less effective, still prevails. The key themes are around NATOs war against Russia, Sinophobia and support for the Zionist project in Palestine.

·        Putin wants to reclaim the “Russin empire”

The well ingrained hatred for communism is being leverages to demonise Putin and Russia, even though it is well understood that Russia is no longer a communist country. Limiting the conversation to post Russia invasion ensures that there is no assessing the root cause – NATO expansion. Many speak about accepting anything, but invasion is a red line. An indoctrinated view of major power geopolitics.

Putin and Russia have shown no inclination of expansion. Putin was quite reluctant to engage in the Special Military Operation. But it is unlikely to cease in the near future as the Oligarchs are clearly lining their pockets and feel no pain – a key difference to the Iran war where the oil prices hit them badly.

·        NATO is a defence alliance and no threat to Russia

The whole idea that NATO is a defence alliance is somewhat irrelevant when it has never been involved in a defence war but many offensive wars (both literally and metaphorically). NATO was conceived and remains as a weapon to wage war against the USSR and now Russia. It is quite puzzling that so many Europeans don’t perceive that.

This together with a sense of entitlement to dominate the region, ensures that NATO will always remain an offensive entity. It is an institution that nations join simply to be able to harass Russia. The Yanks have used it unwisely and we are likely to see dramatic changes in its form or complete dismantlement.

·        The neo-Nazi’s are AFD and Rassemblement national - not AZOV and Likud.

This one baffles most reasonable minded rational thinkers. The EU claims to uphold “free” elections and yet has interfered in almost every election where a government that is not centre was likely to win. It’s interference in Georgia, Romania and France is quite astonishing.

The decision to overlook the obviously NAZI elements in their “ally”, Ukraine whilst prosecuting against the right wing parties labelled as “far right” is an indication of the confusion and lack of leadership capabilities being experienced in the region.

·        Israel is our ally and they would not commit genocide

This message has been a tough sell. A majority of plebs, regardless of how oblivious they are (most wouldn’t know where Palestine is let alone the nature of the issue), could identify a genocide. Yet, many politicians hung themselves to that cross. In most cases the plebs chucked out the incumbent for someone that was even worse simply due to their disgust.

The message was full of contradictions and relied on the denial of the genocide. On one had they said they were supporting “like minded” people with “common values” and “Israel is an ally” whilst “Hamas and Hezbollah were terrorists” none of which made sense when Israel was committing a genocide.

The mostly Jewish Oligarchs of the West have much riding on the settler colony. Like most settler colonies, it is a profit generating machine sponsored by the wealthy nations around the world. Hence its continued but shaky existence. I suspect smart jew money is already fleeing this entity and with it a brain drain.

China, Russia or Iran would never be able to get their citizens to believe any of that! But in the well indoctrinated West, it was a breeze.

So, How to deprogram the West

What we have in the West is a systematic indoctrination that has contained a convoluted mix of contradictions, deliberate untruths, confusion leading to a society that has mostly been misled. Due to their government’s success in making them believe that they are not indoctrinated and it’s only everyone else that is, we have some of the most wealthy and “educated” people on Earth readily being indoctrinated and yet being completely oblivious to it. We should not judge the Western plebs too harshly as they have had and still have the most effective indoctrination machine to contend with.

“We should not judge the Western plebs too harshly as they have had and still have the most effective indoctrination machine to contend with.”

Deprogramming such a deeply ingrained indoctrination will be no easy task. A generational wipe-out is the most likely situation. We see that the younger generations have rejected the indoctrination and as much as the Oligarch and political goons may try, they have lost the instruments they most relied on – the mainstream media.

In addition, the influence the empire had on the civilised world is rapidly collapsing and with it the relevance of European indoctrination is collapsing with it. We already see the civilised world scorn at the West’s genocides, never ending wars and support for settler colonialism, just as much as they ignore the never ceasing threats and “dummy spits” from their political goons. The civilised world would rather have nothing to do with these brutes and hope that the West might cleanse themselves of the current political class and replace it with a new generation of leaders.

Perhaps in half-a-centuries time, some “great” Western analyst will “discover” this and wonder how the West believed such nonsense - perhaps not.

The civilised world is bemused!