Why are Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists?. . . it is a cornerstone of Western strategy!

I can barely remember a time where Hamas and Hezbollah didn't exist nor when they were considered anything but vile terrorists, even worse than the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organisation - or mostly irrelevant Palestinian Authority). That would be the case to many of my age and younger.

Having said that, most would be surprised to hear that neither for these organisations are classified as terrorists by the United Nations. Now, why is that? How is it even possible?

Answering that question turns out to be not that difficult.

But before doing that, let's have a brief overview of who they really are. This is brief, as this information is easily accessible, mostly demonising them as it is the West that has needed to promote this evil narrative and so, as usual, flood the information sources with their version.

Hamas - the warriors of Palestine

Founded 1987 as an offshoot of the Muslim brotherhood (Egypt) during the occupation of the West bank and Gaza by the European Jews. They had little or no association with Iran other than a common cause which was to resist the European Jew occupation of Palestine - hardly an "evil" cause for most of the people of that region.

"Hamas legitimately won the 2006 elections in Palestine . . . It had 44.45% of votes and won 74 of the 132 seats in the legislative council - a clear majority."

Much to the Western empire's disgust, Hamas legitimately won the 2006 elections in Palestine (the so called advocates of democracy, never did implement it in their colonies. It was only after they were booted out that democracy would suddenly be important. Most of you would be surprised that the same occurred in Hong Kong - the British never applied democracy, but after it was transferred to China, it suddenly was important!). It had 44.45% of votes and won 74 of the 132 seats in the legislative council - a clear majority.

Needless to say, Hamas had a challenge on its hand, considering the West's will to destroy it and any resistance to the settler colony - Israel. The British Empire may have been crumbling, but together with the other colonials and the cowboys in Yankee Doodle land, they still could destroy nations economically and through mass murder of humans. Regardless, Hamas and it's leader Ismail Haniyeh were extremely popular within Palestine.

Like the ANC, Haniyeh recognised the beast he was up against. Israel was never going to accept peaceful means - resistance was a key to removing the cancer that was spreading across the land. However, he may have mis-read the sentiment of the West, mistaking them to truly uphold the UN charter. Of course, this never happened. Europe was ridding itself of a cancer under the pretext of Zionism.

"Haniyeh recognised . . . resistance was a key to removing the cancer that was spreading across the land. However, he may have mis-read the sentiment of the West, mistaking them to truly uphold the UN charter. . . . Europe was ridding itself of a cancer under the pretext of Zionism."

So, the key taking from this is that it had nothing to do with Iran, other than the fact that they both resisted the colonisation of Palestine.

Hezbollah - the conquerors of the scourge

In the case of Hezbollah, it was a militia that was formed to defeat the invaders of Lebanon by the barbaric Jew European colony. Whilst the corrupt politician's palms were being greased by the Yanks and French diplomats, Hezbollah took up the fight against the invaders. The are the only military that has completely defeated Israel genocide force (IGF) and forced a retreat from the invaders.

Once again, Iran had nothing to do with it's formation, but supported the resistance to the cancer, as should have any morally decent nation. Of course, no sane person would have expected the Europeans to do that, nor think they were morally decent. They also happen to be Shia, which really doesn't mean anything other than, perhaps, from what we've seen recently, the only religion that does have moral principles driving their actions (I touch on this in a previous blog on Iran - the Lion Roars!).

The West's conundrum

So, we had a West that was attempting to rid themselves of the scourge of Jews (I write about this in the blog "Israel, is the primitive barbaric settler colony viable?"), using the same tools that they were accustomed with over 3 centuries or ethnically cleansing a region of the world to establish an Jewish European colony. They leveraged the Zionist movement and exaggerated hype over the holocaust and the economic powers they had, to sell this abomination to the world.

The sales pitch was only half successful. The civilised world was empathetic to the plight of the jews, but not that much the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Much of the civilised world had experienced the European atrocities themselves. But the civilised world were powerless to do anything about it. This was an era when a nation of cut-throat vagabonds and thieves had emerged as the most powerful military in the world. The world was being led by cowboys masquerading as civilised gentry.

"This was an era when a nation of cut-throat vagabonds and thieves had emerged as the most powerful military in the world. The world was being led by cowboys masquerading as civilised gentry."

So, how to sell a genocide?

The challenge soon became, how to sell a genocide and ethnic cleansing. Whilst they had previously committed genocide ad-nauseum around the world, this time, they had themselves setup a framework - international law - that was a hurdle to committing their usual atrocities. One should always bear in mind that international law was intended to prevent Europeans murdering Europeans and wasn't really meant to stop them murdering others! They had been through 2 wars, where they dragged in their slaves from around the globe as cannon fodder, and then called them "world wars". Thankfully, these wars had weakened them significantly and by this time the empires had mostly vapourised. Refer to this blog where I raise the question - "will Gaza be the West's last genocide?".

". . . international law was intended to prevent Europeans murdering Europeans and wasn't really meant to stop them murdering others!"

To make things worse, they were unaccustomed to selling anything to their new audience, a rather suspicious group who were mostly their former colonies, and previously merely took orders rather than having to be convinced through rational argument. International law had inadvertently (I say inadvertently as the West would never have ceded their colonial powers willingly) empowered the civilised world - although this was inevitable under the circumstances.

The second audience was their citizenry, an audience that was much more easily hoodwinked as they had already been systematically indoctrinated with some of the foundational principles of white supremacy, one god the Christian one, the right to genocide and ethnic cleansing of lesser beings. Churchill is notable for his thoughts on these inferior beings as I discuss in here - "Churchill or Hitler, who was the greater sadistic, racist bigot" ?

The West resorted to the very same tactics they adopted before - demonising the resistance. Being the grotesque aggressors for centuries, this was a tried and tested practice on their victims. One of the themes of demonisation was to label the resistance as barbaric uncivilised terrorists - sub human. We saw this with every resistance group before and most recently with the ANC - they were violent, uncivilised terrorists, until they weren't!

The tag of "terrorist" was quintessential to the West's strategy as it created the anger and animosity required within their citizens required to grant them a free license to conduct the most grotesque atrocities on the resistance. It didn't take much to expand that to the whole "enemy" population by claiming that it was impossible to differentiate the terrorist from the others or that they all were terrorists in one form or another.

We see all of these strategies, quite openly, with the Jewish colony in Palestine. Gaza has been the most visible genocide - which has become a challenge for the Western leadership. Gaza is the last symbol of Western power and dominance (Western "civilisation"), hence we see the political class (Epstein class) defend it with vigour.

Selling the Gaza genocide

Selling the Gaza genocide has proven to be quite challenging and some would argue been the downfall of many European governments. This was a genocide that was watched in real time by the world, despite the vain attempts of Western governments to suppress it.

We had the usual stories of barbarism come out "40 beheaded babies", "babies in ovens", "women raped", "command centres under every civil institution - hospitals, universities, schools etc, "human shields", terrorists hiding as medics and press - you name it, it was drummed into every mainstream channel loud and clear. Of course, within a few days, it was clear to all that this was all fabricated, but the governments did not give in.

There was not one beheaded baby. The Israelis listed the deaths and there was only one kid and he was vapourised by a weapon that couldn't possible have been transported by the resistance, widely thought to be from tank fire. No baby was in ovens nor were there any rapes. Ironically the women who were released by Hamas claimed they were treated like queens.

Not surprisingly, the number of deaths were grossly exaggerated. This is a "colony" that justified it's existence based on exaggerated numbers. When the numbers finally were even remotely accurate, it was clear that most were IGF members or murdered by IGF under the Hannibal directive. One must always bear in mind that to Hamas a dead Israeli was worth nothing, to Israel a living Israeli captured meant disaster - they preferred them dead.

As a distant observer, I sensed that there was something deeply religious about these warriors. Unlike the West, they were extremely humane and respected even their captives. The scenes of the prisoner swapping was quite telling. The zionist prisoners praised their captors, the Palestinians were empty shells of human-beings.

The West has been condition to overlook all of this because "all Palestinians are terrorists" and the Zionists are "our allies" and the "good guys"! It is alarming that Western society was so easily hood-winked in to thinking that.

Of course, in the West the captives were "hostages" even though, theoretically, all (apart from the religious crazies - and I've seen some of them around King David's tomb - scary, very scary), Israelis are part of the IGF and therefore prisoners of war. But don't let the facts get in the way of a the narrative.

Not only did the Westerners witness the courage and humanity of the resistance, in contrast, they saw the barbarism of the IGF. It became blatantly obvious who really were the terrorists. The messaging and narrative of previous colonial atrocities were no longer working. Gen Z, had completely switched off and saw their political leaders as unhinged monsters from a jurasic era - which they were and had been for centuries but not exposed. No doubt "Gen Z will succeed" where ours and previous generations failed dismally.

What we experienced was a classic example of projection. The West, who were committing the barbaric acts of terrorism accusing the resistance of terrorism. But the civilised world was not listening any more and neither were many of the citizens of the West although their political goons (the Epstein class) pursued relentlessly. As a desperate last resort, they are now attempting to lay the foundation for the "Era of Jew exceptionalism".

So, are Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist organisations?

There will be heated debates about this and much like the stupidity often relating to the word genocide, where it is presented by zionists as having a legal definition (which, of course, it does have but it was in use before the legal definition and has a colloquial meaning to it), we will have arguments that suggest by the definition of the word, they are.

Have they conducted actions that can be interpreted as acts of terror. Yes, they have, particularly when it came to the use of rockets which they had little control of. But, were they murdering civilians deliberately? Mostly that was not the case.

Hamas in particular, had little resources and if given smart missiles that could hit specific target, they would have hit military targets only - but they did not have that luxury.

"It is simply stupid that the West chooses to call the Palestinians and Lebanese terrorist, when it is the zionists who established their colony through terrorism and have terrorised the indigenous people of the region ever since."

The situation of the Palestinians and the occupation of Europeans in their land is well understood. It is simply stupid that the West chooses to call the Palestinians and Lebanese terrorist, when it is the zionists who established their colony through terrorism and have terrorised the indigenous people of the region ever since. The West has chosen to normalise that and that is why, to them, it all started on the 7th of October!

The numbers say it all. Close to a 100,000 Palestinians had been murdered by Israeli's before Gaza and, as is widely known, between 150,000- 300,000 have been murdered in Gaza during the intense phase of the genocide and ethnic cleansing. These numbers are under-estimates as they are controlled by Western parties who naturally have an interest in minimising them. Nor do they include the Lebanese, Syrian and Yemeni murders.

In contrast, 3500 European jew "civilians" lost their lives in the equivalent period. On October 7th a further 800 or so died. These numbers will undoubtedly be exaggerated as with the 40 beheaded babies story.

A bit of simple maths would tell you that the zionist terrorists have murdered a 100:1 civilians a grand victory to them, no doubt. Yet, to the West, it is Hamas and Hezbollah that are the terrorists!

When it comes to Palestine, what is clear is that the West is incapable of rationally acting based on facts. Whilst most, if not all, like pack animals, have ganged up to classify both Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organisation in their own countries it is telling that in the UN neither of these organisation are.

Ironically, Israel is not classified a terrorist organisation!

The manifestation of all of this is the waves of anti semitism and "jew exceptionalism legislation" sweeping the West. All of this coming at a time when the empire is crumbling in all aspects - economic, social fabric and militarily. Their continued desperate plight of supporting the monster in Palestine is an indication of how completely discombobulated the society is. The governments, controlled by the Jews, Epstein class, are stripping citizens of freedoms and liberties that they have previously reserved for criticising their "enemies". Europeans have been booted out of the civilised world and have gone back to waging wars amongst themselves.

"The governments, controlled by the Jews, Epstein class, are stripping citizens of freedoms and liberties that they have previously reserved for criticising their "enemies". Europeans have been booted out of the civilised world and have gone back to waging wars amongst themselves."

The civilised world is bemused by all of this. There, not one nation has submitted to the zionist scourge nor taken action on anti-semitism. They understand that the root cause of anti-semitism is not the protest marches and resistance, but the hidious, grotesque, barbaric entity - the zionist settler colony in Palestine. The recent rejection of Germany from the UNSC by the UNGA members is a clear indication of how much the civilised world despise the European position on this matter.

The West created and nurtured a monster, simply to rid themselves of Jews. This monster is now addicted to the power that it has through the shielding of the West, and commits, quite openly, the crimes of our century. Whilst we have a few weasel words from the European political goons, they take no action. The normalisation of flattening cities into rubble may come back to bite the West hard. The civilised world will never accept such barbarism and they don't need to anymore. They may not act with direct conflict, but they will turn their back on this heinous empire and be glad to see it raised to dust.

The justification for nurturing this monster and normalising the flattening of whole cities is based on the fight against terrorists. If Hamas and Hezbullah were not demonised as terror organisations, justifying the barbaric actions would have been near impossible. This is clearly the reason that classifying these two organisation as terrorists is a critical cornerstone of the West's narrative.