Iran - the Lion Roars!. . . marking the end of the barbaric Western Empire.

I have refrained from writing about this ludicrous and wasteful war because it made no sense from any point of view, apart from the primitive barbaric Jewish European settler colony's. The crumbling European empire is scrambling like headless chooks - their citizenry desperate for good governance but having few options but to elect thugs and goons who have little to offer and motives of personal wealth accumulation whilst they still can. Their economies are crumbling and they fallback to their only answer to all things, war - an activity they once dominated but are increasingly finding themselves short. They started off singing to the hymn sheet - the Iranian regime is a terrorist regime that must be eliminated - and then when the Strait of Hormuz was closed they rapidly changed their tune begging for the war to be ended! They are nothing but a bunch of contemptible fools.

The civilised world wishes, the problem that is the Western Empire, would simply go away. They recognise that the death pangs will be painful but are unsure the extent. The poorer nations are suffering from the inflationary pressures and the price of oil. Their economies needed this war like a bullet in the head. Unfortunately, after raping, plundering and pillaging these nations, they are very much low on the priorities of the West.

Context

Undoubtedly this is a war of the West against its opposition in West Asia - primarily Iran. Positioning it in any other way would be deceit.

". . . the West carried out a coup and installed a puppet dictator so that they could syphon the nation's oil and gas resources."

Most of us are familiar with the history, though it is often the Western narrative. Effectively the West carried out a coup and installed a puppet dictator so that they could syphon the nation's oil and gas resources. The dictator committed heinous crimes across the nation murdering anything from 6,000 - 60,000 citizens over the course of the dictatorships. A populist revolution took place that overthrew the dictator. On the 30th March 1979 in a referendum (which is conveniently ignored by the West) the citizens opted for a democratic governing system that was guided by the religious order of the nation - Shia Islam. On the 1st of April 1979 the Islamic Republic of Iran was established.

The West's desperation.

Not surprisingly, from the moment the modern Islamic Republic was established, the West demonised it and waged war after war. Unlike the fake gulf nations established by the West under dubious agreements such as Sykes Picot, Iran was one of the mega civilisational nations that formed the cradle of humanity.

Within months of its establishment, the West waged their first war against the republic through their proxy, Iraq. On the 22nd September 1980 Iraq, armed with Chemical weapons from the West, waged a hideous war and millions died on both sides. The casualties of the chemical weapons are estimate at 100,000 - 200,000 (one can be certain that these numbers are under-estimated partly due to the difficulty of accounting for them, but also due to Western propaganda that attempted to sweep it under the carpet). Though initially, an Iranian army that was in disarray took some tactical defeats, it was not long before the nation organised itself and began to win strategically. The lion roared, the West "surrendered", Iran had reclaimed any lost ground and was ready to wipe out Iraq - ironically, something the West proceeded to do later, under the instruction of the rogue Jew terrorist entity.

The hot war was lost, but the cartel of political goons of the West were not going to give up, they resorted to the next best thing - a cold war, effectively sanctioning Iran simply for being a sovereign nation that stood firmly on upholding the governing system that was established by an overwhelming majority in the revolution.

Amidst the chaos that was being inflicted in the region by the West, Iran was principled and abided by international law in every instance - this was more due to their policy being framed by religious and moral principles.

"Iraq, armed with Chemical weapons from the West, waged a hideous war and millions died on both sides."

Iran's principles based governance ensured it was always on the right side of history. Be its support for Kuwait during the invasion by Iraq or Palestine during the colonisation by the Jewish Europeans and whilst the Sunni Arab clown princesses looked the other way in favour of money. It provided aid to Qatar when the West used another of their proxies, Saudi, to blockade Qatar.

A principled government was something that could not be tolerated by the cartel of goons - it could show them up for the vulgar barbarians that they are. The propaganda machine was in full tilt and vicious. We saw the usual themes of "terrorism" and "evil" - Iran was in every "axis" that the West could conceive. The indoctrination was effective and it is near impossible to find a citizen of the West that would think of Iran favourably.

Iran took little notice, partly due to the fact that they were no match to the West in the field of propaganda and they were a nation that was recovering from Western pillage.

The Iranian perspective.

After defeating Iraq, the Iranian government set out to re-build a nation that had been ravaged by the West. With extreme sanctions applied to them at a time when sanctions were impactful. They looked inward and slowly but surely built an economy that was largely self-sufficient.

"Iran now has the largest number of female, yes, female engineers in the world."

The government established robust institutions and focused on educating the citizenry. Iran now has the largest number of female, yes, female engineers in the world.

The political system has proven to ensure the leadership are amongst the smartest and capable people in the country, in many ways similar to Chinese democracy. Quite a contrast to the Western system which continues to deliver incompetent salesmen and women who are clueless. A corrupt paedophile as leader was simply not possible under this system as all potential leaders were vetted by the religious elites. The Iranian leadership is typically filled by professors and doctors - most Western nations would rather have the Iranian leadership to what they have now. Although the indoctrination in the West prevents any rational discussion on this.

" . . . after 9-11, when the Zionists concocted grand plans to destroy West Asia and reap the benefits."

The Iranian leadership were distinctly aware of the on-going threat they had from the Yanks and their attack dog - the rogue terrorist colony in Palestine. Particularly after 9-11, when the Zionists concocted grand plans to destroy West Asia and reap the benefits. Most of which was accomplished with the complete destruction of Libya, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Syria and Lebanon. Iran was the last pillar standing.

The axis of resistance.

Whilst in Western propaganda, Iran is labelled the primary enabler of terrorism in the world - a label that one is not allowed to question - the reality is quite different and the West is quite ignorant on the matter. The primary, so called, "terrorist" organisations Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthis were not established by Iran. They were indigenous resistance groups to Western colonialism and interference.

Hamas was established and funded by Mr. Mileikowsky as a ploy to prevent the 2 state solution. Hamas won a democratic election in Gaza and legitimately governed the region. The resistance arm of Hamas fought a legal war against an invading colonial entity

Hezbollah was established by the Lebanese resistance post the rogue terrorist colony's invasion of Lebanon. It was Hezbollah that liberated Lebanon through acts of resistance, all very legal under international law. Iran supported the resistance as should have any civilised nation.

The Houthis were established by Yemenis who resisted against the Western and Saudi influence and interference. Also, completely legitimate.

These were entities with religious beliefs and mostly operated under Islamic principles. The West chose to conflate these entities with ISIS (and its many predecessors) who were corrupt organisations setup by the West. But in the well indoctrinated Islamophobic West, they were tarred with the same brush with ease. In the end, they were all working against the same barbaric enemy - the West and it's attack dog in Palestine. So statements like "Hamas are terrorists" are never challenged, they are considered the part that is already agreed on - a typical strategy in Western indoctrination and propaganda, when avoiding the root causes and factual evidence. So, everything started on October 7th - a narrative easily sold to the West.

". . . none of these organisations have been classified as terrorist organisations even by a highly biased UN."

It is noteworthy that none of these organisations have been classified as terrorist organisations even by a highly biased UN. However, why would this stop the West from spinning a good story. Effectively the citizenry of the West live in a parallel universe of spin and innuendo, without any sense of reality and, disturbingly, don't even know it. The indoctrination is so ingrained that they think it is the civilised world that has been hood-winked! With the explosion of independent media, this situation is rapidly changing. They are discovering that, perhaps it was they who have been hood-winked all along.

It is rarely that these indoctrinated humanoids in the West ever stop to think how they would react if people of another continent invaded their land and committed a genocide on them - this is a question that the Western discourse can never get to, as it is shot down with talking points of "terrorism" etc., long before you get to it. This has been a successful Zionist strategy which is breaking down much more rapidly than yours truly anticipated. This has never been an issue in the civilised world who saw through all of this with clarity.

Iran's nuclear program.

One cannot complete the context without addressing the primary "excuse" of the West, that has always prevailed to destroy Iran - its nuclear program.

The program was commenced as early as 1957 and strongly supported by the Yanks as this was the time when it was effectively a "colony" of the US. It was mostly an indigenous program, particularly after the revolution in 1979, and became the pride of the nation and symbolic of its sovereignty. It was entirely a civilian program and the Supreme Leader declared nuclear weapons illegal in 2000 (referred to as the fatwa) and later consolidated this further with the banning of Weapons of Mass Destruction WMDs in 2003. This was formalised in a statement to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) in August 2005.

Iran had observed the systematic destruction of any effort by the region to build a sustainable energy infrastructure based on nuclear power, destroyed by the West through their attack dog in Palestine. As such they constructed their many metres under mountain ranges, ensuring they were less susceptible to attacks from the West. The 12 day war proved the strategy to be somewhat successful.

"It was entirely a civilian program and the Supreme Leader declared nuclear weapons illegal in 2000 (referred to as the fatwa) . . . "

Iran opened up their nuclear operations to the world for monitoring and despite all the fearmongering and usual nonsense of the West, the world knew everything that there was to know about the program. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was supposedly the vehicle to lift sanctions on Iran, but as usual, like the Minsk accords, it was merely a game the West were playing - they had no intension of adhering to it. Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018. Iran complied with the restrictions for a further 2 years and then when no sanctions were lifted nor trade levels increased, they began to increase the levels of enrichment mostly to apply pressure on the West to abide by the treaty but also as a hedge against the expansionist barbaric colony in the region. To what level, is hard to say as the only thing one can be sure of is that the West would exaggerate the numbers.

It is important to recognise that there are many other facets to successfully delivering a nuclear bomb including the delivery vehicle, the detonation mechanism etc. Whilst Iran has certainly displayed the capability in each of these functions, it is difficult to assess how rapidly they might be able to combine all of it to deliver such a weapon.

Iran's defence strategy

It would be arrogant to think that we know Iran's strategy - they are far too intelligent a nation - but from what we've seen to-date there are some conclusions we can come to.

Ever since the revolution, Iran has had the cloud of destruction by the West overhanging them. It didn't take much for them to realise that they would not be able to compete against the empire playing to the rules of war that the West delve in - it was too expensive.

" . . . whilst the Zionists were the antagonists and root cause, it was the empire (Yanks and Europe) that was the enemy they would fight in any war."

They made some key strategic decisions that led to innovation and a pragmatic approach to defence.

1. Define the enemy: They recognised that whilst the Zionists were the antagonists and root cause, it was the empire (Yanks and Europe) that was the enemy they would fight in any war. As such they strategically assessed the enemies strengths and weaknesses. 
2. Select a winning war methodology: Asymmetrical war was not their invention, but they took it to the next level. They focused on cheap, but modern, effective, weapons and produced thousands of them. The introduction of suicide drones as an attack weapon was an Iranian innovation, although first widely used in Ukraine by the Russians and NATO.
3. Decentralise the command structure: The losses of commanders in the 12 day war exposed the vulnerability of the structure to the enemy. Iran's response was to decentralise the military given authority and autonomy to the decentralised divisions.
4. Target the enemy's weaknesses: They recognised that it was near impossible to defend themselves from the barrage of missiles that would be directed at them. The technology required would be expensive, sophisticated, out of their reach and proven to be largely ineffective. So they focussed on the principle that the Archilles heel of the West was its pain threshold - the inability to bare pain. Iran's strength would be in its ability to incurring damage and pain on the West through attack capability and other means, such as economic throttling. 
5. Protect critical production capability: They invested in protecting their production capability by building indigenous manufacturing and storage capability deep under mountains and decentralised across the nation. 
6. Degrade enemy logistics & intelligence: It was critical that all enemy assets in the region needed to knocked out early ensuring lengthy logistics and failing intelligence. A destroyed fighter was worth 1 fighter, a refuelling aircraft was worth a squadron. 

Much of this was untested until the 12 day war, where they had the opportunity to validate and rectify this strategy. The necessity to have a decentralised command structure was one of the key learnings from that war. They also learned how poorly their anti-aircraft systems performed and scrambled to improve this weakness with limited success.

Iran's missile program.

The missile program was a primary pillar of Iran's defence strategy. Ever since the revolution, Iran has had the threat of destruction by the West overhanging them. It didn't take much for them to realise that they would not be able to compete against the empire playing to the rules of war that the West delved in - it was too expensive.

Iran set out to develop a sophisticated indigenous missile and drone production capability. This capability is now, if not the most sophisticated, is certainly amongst the most innovative and efficient in terms of value for money. They now possess hypersonic, solid fuel rocket propelled, multi-head ballistic missiles that are capable of varying flight paths in-flight making interception near impossible.

Strait of Hormuz

Quite predictably, the strait of Hormuz has been weaponised by Iran. They announced it many times before the war to anyone that was listening. Arrogance did get in the way of the West hearing what was being said. The media along with Western political goons have made sure that no-one really understood the situation with the Strait. So I felt it worth clarifying some of the key principles.

1. The Strait is territorial waters divided between Iran and Oman and NOT international waters.
2. The Western powers coerced many nations to sign-up to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which defines freedom of navigation in the strait.
3. Iran has not ratified UNCLOS and therefore has never given up its rights to control the water under certain circumstances.
4. Historically, Iran has had laws relating to the body of water which existed for centuries and precedes UNCLOS. Rulings of the ICC have set a precedence that suggest these laws must be taken into consideration.
5. Iran has, in recent times, been attacked illegally 3 times over and has a right to control the strait under those condition. Bearing in mind the rogue colony's past practices and track record of illegal actions (beeper explosion atrocity), it would amount to negligence for Iran to allow navigation without close monitoring of the waterway.

An interesting Iranian interpretation and legal argument is presented here. It is an unfortunate reflection of our times that Iranian sources are significantly more intellectual and reliable than the bluster that comes out of the West, who have lost the ability to analyse anything and usually are simply spinning an argument to suit their narrative.

The West has consistently bullied and provoked nations by violating UNCLOS by directing heavily armed naval armada through sensitive waters around China and other areas, under the pretext of "freedom of navigation" exercises. Usual then claiming that China was acting more "aggressively"! The usual tactic of projection. Of course, no nation did that in reverse until more recently when China has returned the favour.

Casus Belli

The West struggled to put together a consistent, credible story on why they declared war. Whilst the Europeans claimed they were not consulted, it was clear to the world that as soon as Modi ended his frolicking with Mr. Mileikowsky on the beaches of Tel Aviv the operation would commence. The political goons of the West simply needed an alibi as the citizens weren't quite as agreeable to war as were the goons.

However, to any analyst the drivers were clear and none of them were new.

1. The window of opportunity was rapidly closing: The rogue colony was panicking, not because Iran would have a bomb - Iran had no intention of developing a bomb, that was the one thing that everyone agreed on - but because their power was reliant on American support and hegemony. Both factors that were rapidly fading.
2. The Trump regime was easily hood-winked and susceptible to blackmail: The Zionists needed the Yanks to fight their war against Iran. The Trump regime was the only administration that the Zionists had complete control of, due to Trumps ignorance making him an easy prey into believing Jewish hyperbole and the dirt they had on him - the Epstein investment was paying off. The popularity of the administration was taking a nose dive and it was more than likely that within 8 or so months the Trump administration would lose the house and senate and, even worse, Trump would be impeached.
3. Iran was the only remaining resistance to the Greater Israel project: Destroying Iran into a failed state the likes of Syria, would remove all resistance to the ambitions of the Zionists as the gulf states were easily bought and open to bribery and corruption. Iran was the last man standing.
4. Iran was at its weakest: There were several analysts who felt that Iran was at its weakest as the colonialists had conducted mass murder of the Lebanese and Palestinians and this was somehow construed as being weakening Iran itself.
5. The "regime" was assumed unpopular: The protest that took place a few months prior to the war which then turned into a riot incited by CIA and MOSSAD agents was construed to be a sign that the political system was unpopular and given the incentive, the population would revolt - much like in Ukraine and many other CIA operations.
6. The legacy of two egoistic maniacs: The stars had aligned with two ego-maniacs leading the primary crusader- zionist nations. Both of whom were seeking to have great legacies that would be revered for years. Mr. Mileikowsky aspires to be the Jewish leader who rebuilt the Jewish nation and Trump fantasised about this same title although incentivised by bribes and jew-mail - the Epstein files. Whilst never really discussed in mainstream discourse, this was a critical factor in the initiation of the war as well as the inability to get out of it.

War objectives

If the reasons for war were considered vague, the objectives were absolutely non-existent. The mad hatter regime in Washington were intellectually incapable of defining clear objectives and to them, they didn't need any as the war was to last a couple a days and be over.

The ideal scenario was a combination of the following with the emphasis given to different things depending on which day it was!

1. Regime change: The government system would be destroyed.
2. Establishment of puppet regime: The former Shah's son would be a puppet that the Yanks and the colony could exploit.
3. Balkanising Iran into a failed state: The objective was to ensure Iran could never be a force in the future. Like Libya and Syria, it would be broken in to smaller pieces ensuring internal squabbles and failure as a state.
4. Regional hegemony: The elimination of all resistance would enable the expansion of the colony and the access to the hydro carbons of its neighbours - greater israel. The colony would be the hegemon or Super power (a more recently used term by the colony's goons) in the region.

The illegal war

On the 28th February, after the markets had closed and Modi had returned after fraternising with the butcher on the beaches of Tel Aviv, the West attacked Iran. Within the first few ours they had slaughtered thousands of civilians, including several or the Iranian leadership. The adrenaline hit was immense and the ego boosting jingoism was flaunted. Victory was claimed within hours and there was a pompous calling for the people of Iran to rise-up and claim their nation. They waited. . . and waited . . . and waited - there was no uprising. Much to the contrary, they had masses of Iranians fill the streets of Tehran in support of their nation. Like a sugar hit, the rush was short lived and then came the trough of depression.

In typical Western fashion, within the first few hours they had committed some of the most heinous crimes - crimes which have been made fashionable by the IGF (Israel genocide force). Images began to flood the internet of a school in Minab, where 180 young girls had been double or triple tapped creating absolute carnage. The usual denials took place - they even accused Iran of using Yankee weapons and committing the crime on their own people. Perhaps an accusation that would have worked prior to the internet and the availability of images. No-one was falling for the "40 beheaded babies" stories anymore.

The West threw everything they had, trillions of dollars, rapidly emtying their stockpiles but hardly made a dent. Iran was far too vast a nation. The West was struggling to figure what they could do to make any impact.

The Iranians had withstood the barrage and it was clear that they had begun to implement their war strategy. The West was helpless. As the missile tranches began to hit the colony, there was a cathartic wave that swept the civilised world - Finally, the genocidal regime was tasting some of its own medicine. One by one, they knocked out the bases in the gulf and the satellite equipment. In addition, they began to demilitarise the colony. The yanks panicked and filled hotels with military personnel - a war crime - and then cried foul when Iran promptly attacked the hotels. The Iranian response was systematic and unrelenting. The folks in BOOM BOOM Tel Aviv had no sleep for weeks. Their "macho" prime minister was in hiding for weeks stooping down to the absolute ludicrous lows of publishing AI generated videos of himself!

"The Iranian response was systematic and unrelenting. The folks in BOOM BOOM Tel Aviv had no sleep for weeks. Their "macho" prime minister was in hiding for weeks . . ."

Clearly the Mileikowsky "promise" didn't materialise - the over confidence of the West resulted in them not being prepared for a war that even lasted a couple of days let alone 2 months. The yanks were panicking and stealing weapons from all over the globe. They had divert already fatigued fleets from the opposite side of the world. The sailors on board mutinied and clogged the toilets with their uniforms! It was a comedy in play observing the "command" in action. They sent the HMS ford into the Mediterranean where it sat bobbing around awhile gathering rust whilst the sailors were queuing up to take a bog. They then snuck the boat through the Suez canal into the Red sea only to realise it was going nowhere as the red sea was being chocked by the Houthis. So it bobbed around there for awhile before it was attacked and was on fire. They claimed it was the laundry and scurried the boat back home.

Within a couple of weeks the mad hatter administration waved the white flag, in typical Trumpian fashion - just claim the enemy was begging for peace. The Iranians let him sweat awhile and then set out the terms. The mad hatters immediately laughed at the terms with the hope that they would surrender. The Iranians did not respond. Finally the West claimed they had a "new" proposal and accepted the original terms from Iran. After a few false starts a ceasefire took place six weeks into the war, on the 8th of April.

Iran had destroyed its enemy and convincingly won the war no matter which framework one used to assess it. The West had surrendered yet again.

"Unlike the West fabricating stories of "40 beheaded babies", in Iran, the 180 martyred babies, bless their innocent souls, is real."

A world that had become accustomed to the treacherous Western warfare of genocide, torture, rape, bestiality, weapons of mass destruction, assassinations, indiscriminatory murder of civilians, journalists, medical staff, were now witnessing a noble form of warfare which was strategic, measured, reciprocal, focused on military assets and yet, successful.

This was a war of Strategy vs Tactical, Patience vs Immediate Gratification, Sharia vs Judeo-Christianity, Islam vs Crusaderism, Civilised vs Barbarism, Colonialism vs Resistance, Noble vs Scumbag. Yes, perhaps the good ole' Western adage "good vs evil". Unlike the West fabricating stories of "40 beheaded babies", in Iran, the 180 martyred babies, bless their innocent souls, is real.

So, why did the war fail?

Historians and analysts will have a field day arguing this question. What is clear is that both the Colony and Yanks never in their wildest dreams expected to lose. No matter how you look at it, none of the objectives were even remotely accomplished. What they did accomplish was the murder of civilians and a large number of buildings and infrastructure - the barbaric colony's approach which they refer to as "applying maximum pressure" but is nothing more than collective punishment and terrorism, both war crimes. The Yanks took the same strategy as a means of overcoming their frustration with failure.

1. The gap in strategic leadership: The terrorists were being led by impatient goons who were incapable of any strategic planning. They simply had a list of targets and they went about destroying them. In addition, there is nothing worse for morale than to know that your leadership was incompetent whilst your enemy was being led by the most strategic minds on Earth. The Yanks and their colony were playing tiddly-winks whilst the Iranians, Chess.

2. Confidence in strategy: After the first few hours, it was clear the terrorists strategy was looking like a failure or at best, shaky. They had murdered many of the leadership with almost no impact. The apparent uprising simply did not occur but on the contrary, millions poured into the streets in support of their leadership. A panicked leadership then made irrational tactical decisions that simply reflected a leadership in complete disarray.

   In contrast, the Iranians had confidence and stuck to their strategy. The de-centralisation of command was paying dividends. Systematically they destroyed the enemies regional assets and intelligence destroying all the enemy bases in the gulf and Iraq. They attacked the aircraft carriers ensuring they fled to over a 1,000km away from their borders - a significant distance for conducting offensive missions. They increased the pain by closing the Hormuz straight - a legitimate war time action. They attacked military targets all around the colony with mixed success - but with increasing effectiveness. What was clear was that, Iran clinically focussed on destroying military assets unlike the terrorists who needed to create a spectacle for the consumption of their leadership, hawkish political goons and blood thirsty citizens.

3. Long war: The Iranians planned for a long war. They understood well that they could withstand the initial flare and bluster of the West - this is a civilisational nation greater, in size, than Europe! The cowboys let loose with everything they had until they hadn't! It is inconceivable the buffoonery of the cowboys, who instantly ran through all the arsenal and were scrambling around the world stealing other nation's stockpiles and then begging for a ceasefire. So, distressed were the clowns in Washington that they attempted to use nuclear bombs and were prevented only by a clear thinking military man. In contrast, the Iranian slowly but surely increased the pressure with well-planned regular barrages of missile attacks. What became obvious to all was that the goons were never going to sustain a credible warring capability.
4. Leadership clarity vs arrogance and hubris: The 4 decades of planning and the clear thought processes of the Iranian leadership had proven to be undefeatable, even by the supposedly most powerful military in the world. The strategic thinkers of Iran had blitzed the flustered minute by minute tactical blunders of the cowboys. This was a military that had never been tested. Both the colony and the cowboys were great at murdering civilians, but failed dismally when it was confronted by a roaring lion led by strategic thinkers.

So, what of the "most powerful military the world has ever seen"?

In a matter of a mere 6 weeks, the Yankee Doodle military had reduced itself to dads-army-esqe comical outfit. They made real fools of themselves in almost every endeavour they made. Aircraft stuck in sand, invincible aircraft shot down or damaged, clustered aircraft wiped out whilst parked on runways, aircraft lost to "friendly fire", you name it and they experienced it. An incompetent commander in chief surrounded by radio personalities and a war obsessed Cuban refugee didn't help. This is the military that overran Iraq within 3 weeks and here they had hardly managed to put a boot on the ground and even amongst the boots that did set foot, most were involuntary - shot out of the sky!

The only defence I could conjour up for them, is the total juvenile amateurism intellectually challenged command line. One can only imagine the state of mind of the military personnel who couldn't have had the slightest confidence in their leadership's judgment knowing fully well that they were up against the strategic masterminds of Iran. The morale simply could not have been great.

As for their accomplices, the barbaric Israel Genocide Force, they were suffering from their own demons and restricted themselves to doing what they are good at - murdering babies, kids and women.

"This was a complete thrashing in every way. Comparable to the great victory of Saladin over the third crusade - the strategic tacticians verses a bunch of crude hideous thugs."

This was a complete thrashing in every way. Comparable to the great victory of Saladin over the third crusade - the strategic tacticians verses a bunch of crude hideous thugs. Definitely not what the ego-centric two leaders had in mind the day the attack on another sovereign nation, Iran, took place.

Can the negotiations succeed?

As usual the Yanks made their braggadocios demands of complete surrender etc., but in the end Iran presented a 10 point basis for negotiations. The Yanks promptly declined it but after a further couple of week of war, they succumbed to the very same 10 points that were presented in the first place.

Having agreed to the 10 points and a ceasefire, the Yanks promptly denied all of it - nothing surprising there. The Iranians knew very well the nature of Yankee Doodle land. They also recognised the administrations need to safe face amongst its citizenry.

There were many claims and counter claims but the crux of the positions taken were

1. Iran: Reclaimed their sovereignty as defined by the UN charter for every nation including the right to enrich uranium, no sanction, reparations for illegal war and control of their territorial waters.
2. Yanks: No enrichment was their main requirement (although they articulated this as no nuclear bomb, to conflate the two in domestic messaging) but they also wanted the strait of Hormuz open to free navigation as a face saving measure. Mostly they wanted to stop the continuous drain of money and return home.
3. Zionists: No Iran!

The mad hatter administration figured out that they were hood-winked and suckered into the Mileikowsky sales pitch. They simply want to save face and get out of the region. The negotiation is now about saving face - a challenge under the circumstances. Although the Iranians fully understand the predicament of a "democratic" leaders need to have a message for the citizens. They have no interest in prolonging the war either but they are not willing to forfeit their rights which every nation is entitle to.

No doubt there will be manoeuvres made by each side and more recently we've had the Yanks violate the ceasefire on a couple of occasions. The Iranians have ignored the bait and my reading of these worthless provocations is that the Yanks are about to fold and return home.

The unknown known is that the rogue colony clearly has some leverage on Trump - most likely from the Epstein operation. For the colony, a negotiated settlement could very well be an existential outcome. The likelihood that this crusade could survive without the support from Europeans is minimal. The pronouncements coming out of Tehran are quite telling. No doubt the death pangs will be severe to the region as we already see the uncontrolled carnage it is imposing on civilians across Lebanon. But in the greater scheme of things, it is an insignificant entity that has been overplaying its role through a stranglehold of the European political goons.

Where to from here?

Looking into the crystal ball, one can see a path for decent humanity returning not purely to the region, but across the world. Some potential aspects maybe:

1. Withdrawal of the empire: The mad hatter administration has always questioned its operations across the globe. The experience in this war has proven the implausibility of bases in the gulf region when they are unprotectable from Iran. It is likely that the Yanks will withdraw most, if not all, of their bases from the region. This convincing defeat by a middle power will certainly make the empire think many times before indulging in misadventures. Clearly plans for the China war will be binned forever.
2. Rise of the civilised world: The world will move back to equilibrium from what has been a turbulent 3-4 centuries of genocide and destruction. The civilised world, led by the mega civilisational nations of China, India and Iran will return to being the dominant civilisations.
3. Decline of the settler colony and Jew exceptionalism: It is likely that the world will overcome the West's guilt over the Nazi crimes and revolt against Jewish exceptionalism and the settler colony fade away.
4. Return to Islamic control of the region: 150 years of European dominance in the region will end and Islamic culture will once again flourish.
5. Peace and economic prosperity returns: With the withdrawal of Europeans, the region will be free to thrive economically.

"What confronts the mad hatter administration is, not merely a ceasefire, nor ending the war, nor a withdrawal from the region - it is concession of the end of a heinous barbaric Western Empire."

What confronts the mad hatter administration is, not merely a ceasefire, nor ending the war, nor a withdrawal from the region - it is concession of the end of a heinous barbaric Western Empire.