Israel, is the primitive barbaric Jewish European settler colony viable?

There are many arguments, and in the Zionist agenda, it is a given that "Israel has a right to exist". No one really knows why nor do most really care - too busy doing their own thing. Apparently some unknown person once wrote that a crazy god gave it to them a many thousands of years ago. A narrative that one must never be questioned or else one is labelled an antisemite (a term that has lost it's weight through ridiculous definitions of IHRA which comically have been adopted by the political goons of the West - yours truly is a proud "antisemite" under the definition.).

The context

Interestingly I have found a couple of interesting counter arguments to this, as if one is even needed for such a crazy theory. One suggested that unless it had borders and therefore doesn't exist! OK, there is some validity to this argument but the one I preferred was offered by the UN special rapporteur, who simply said no country has a "right to exist" they simply exist!

If there was any real argument for the Jewish European settler colony, it would be based on the UN General Assembly resolution 181in 1947 and perhaps some other more aggressive resolutions thereafter diluting Palestinian rights further. This was a period when the world was in economic tatters and most nations were looking inwards for reconstituting their economies. Many of them fighting for independence.

"It must be understood that the inception of the Zionist project was long before the so called "holocaust"."

Not surprisingly the Zionists took advantage of this. Whilst they had little interest in the human tragedy that took place in Europe, they recognised the rich propaganda material that it presented in furthering their cause. It must be understood that the inception of the Zionist project was long before the so called "holocaust". The propaganda was immense and the extent of Jew deaths were multiplied over and over again as was the case with the "40 beheaded babies" slogan.

The Jew controlled propaganda machine, primarily in Yankee Doodle land but also in Europe, swing in to top gear. We had the never ending victimhood stories, many of them invented by Jews to expedite their passports to the US. We had the stream of movies from Hollywood and we had the whole bribery, blackmail and political control mechanism creating the Epstein class. This was the most sophisticated indoctrination program the world has ever experienced and it was targeted at the most powerful nations - US and Europe. The rest didn't really matter. Was "The diary of Anne Frank" even true?

"This was the most sophisticated indoctrination program the world has ever experienced and it was targeted at the most powerful nations - US and Europe. The rest didn't really matter. Was "The diary of Anne Frank" even true?"

There was sympathy to their cause, much based on the propaganda but there was little means of verifying this and the Zionists new this well.

In addition, the UN had been established by the winners of the war with the intent of exploiting the rest of the world. The transition from colonialism to neo-colonialist was about to take place with the UN being a fundamental instrument of enablement. A majority of nations were seeking aid from the colonialists and had no option but to comply with their wishes. In this context, the Palestinians were sold out and the Zionists through terrorism and other means accomplished their goals.

"The transition from colonialism to neo-colonialism was about to take place with the UN being a fundamental instrument of control and enablement."

Although the signs of what was to come were already evident, few realised the nature of the cancer they had introduced to Palestine. The Zionists had a foot-hold and the Europeans were finally irradicating the Jews who they considered to be parasites and lowest scum on Earth. The rest of the world, outside of Palestine, really did not pay much attention to what was happening as it had little impact on them at the time.

And so, Europe, as one of it's last curses, gifted the Jewish European settler colony to the civilised world!

What constitutes Israel?

As the Jew terrorist groups in Palestine - Irgun, Lehi, and Haganah, funded and supported by the crusader nations of the world, began to further arm themselves preparing for invasion, the Arabs were in a state of chaos.

Whilst, in typical Jew fashion, they glorified their conquests, they had no real opposition. They were always  better equipped and that was ensured by the West, who did not want to see them back in Europe. It was a tough gig for the Arabs, who were mostly still colonies and had no resources to take on a military colony that was armed by the most wealthy and powerful nations of the time.

There was a steady flow of migration, but the real question was who was migrating and how high was "Israel" on the list of preferences of the Jews?

As with all settler colonies, it is never the smartest nor most wealthy people who migrate from wealthy nations. Australia is a classic example of this. The unskilled peasants of Europe migrated there making the "white only" policy unsustainable. The skilled migration was from nations where the living standards were lower. No European with a decent career in Europe would migrate to Australia. This same principle applied to the Jews and the colony.

When I worked in Australia, whenever there was a Westerner involved, particularly Anglo Saxon, I would predict that they would be a show pony - just look and talk the part but have not capability. On many occasions the people would later admit to me that I had been correct with these predictions. But, that is what one must expect in European settler colonies.

". . . the Jewish "scum" of Europe migrated to Palestine."

So, the Jewish "scum" of Europe migrated to Palestine. The more principled and resourceful Jews, of which there are many (although too many of them support the genocidal settler colony), preferred to remain in Europe or migrate to the US.

The colony badly needed scale and much propaganda to attract people. Funding was never an issue and they controlled the purse strings and the whitemailed political goons in the US and Europe were held hostage because they never wanted them back.

The people who migrated were there purely for rapid wealth accumulation and kept their options open to return or take flight to other more decent locations.

How to keep the colony alive?

If the colony was to survive, there were several primary success factors.

1. Economies of scale - building a critical mass of population.
2. Ethnic cleansing to ensure a Jewish population of 70% or higher.
3. Ensuring the region remained economical and militarily weak.
4. Extreme indoctrination of the West and the colony itself.
5. Whitemailing the Epstein class - i.e. the political goons of the West

At it's inception, the colony had little trouble enticing people to migrate there. Many who survived the European camps and ghettos had little possessions and chose to migrate. The Europeans and Yanks provided plenty of incentive, through funds and weapons, to do so. Even then, it was the social underclasses, not the smart and wealthy, who migrated - the others had better options.

As with most settler colonies, this entity was not about a sustainable long term civilisational society - they were replacing one. It was based on capitalism and rapid asset accumulation. Many who arrived were likely to have more NAZI genes in them than Semite. Effectively, they attracted the least desirable on Earth and segregated them in occupied land. In effect, a single large concentration camp.

". . . this entity was not about a sustainable long term civilisational society - they were replacing one. It was based on capitalism and rapid asset accumulation. Many who arrived were likely to have more NAZI genes in them than Semite."

Ethnic cleansing was essential to ensure the apartheid state would prevail. A small number of other ethnicities would remain as slaves to perform the menial tasks. This presented quite a challenge as conducting a genocide while using a so called "holocaust" as it's justification of existence was no easy task. But the unwavering support of the White supremacist nations, who were losing more and more of  control over their other colonies with each passing day, was where they got protection and entitlement to carry out a slow genocide on the indigenous people of the region. They called it "mowing the lawn".

Whilst the colony was mowing the lawn in Palestine, the Europeans were mowing the lawn in the region, ensuring that none of the nations in the region could present a challenge to this abomination. Systematically and periodically, the Europeans destroyed the region - Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Lebanon etc. No nation was spared unless they knelt down to the empire. The Arab clown princesses, all heinous family dictators who were planted and propped up by the West to control access to oil, had no option but to bow to their masters.

With the disunity and cowardice of the Arabs, the only remaining resistance was and still remains Iran - a nation that heroically liberated itself from the clutches of the US hegemon and has stood up for just causes globally time and time again - Palestine, Lebanon, Kuwait, Qatar etc. The West's hatred towards them is understandable.

The indoctrination of the West was paramount to the colony's "success" to-date. Islamophobia was easily embedded in a society that had crusaderism deeply ingrained in their DNA. A common strategy of apartheid states is to demonise and dehumanise the oppressed. We saw that in South Africa where all blacks were animals and terrorists until they suddenly weren't! It is no different in Palestine. The internet has changed the equation and indoctrination is more challenging even with a primarily Jew owned mainstream media. Gen Z is not easily hoodwinked unlike previous generations.

"Islamophobia was easily embedded in a society that had crusaderism deeply ingrained in their DNA."

Within the colony, the indoctrination was extreme. Everyone (barring the religious fanatics) had to join the military and conduct atrocities on Palestinians. The dehumanising of Palestinians was essential so they could be murdered, raped, exterminated without any remorse or fear. The indoctrination began from birth and by the time they were 5 or 6 they sang songs of murdering the animals and taking their homes.

A crafty plan was formulated to whitemail the political goons of the West, the Epstein class, and in particular the Yanks. This included a combination of sexual seduction, bribery and coercion by funding opponents or digging dirt and promoting it in media. It was impossible to be a politician in the US without supporting the Jewish European colony.

Right now we have a catastrophic war in West Asia in which the Yanks involvement is thought to be, by many, a result of the whitemailing and Epstein class and a compromised POTUS - it is probably the only rational reason for this war.

Is this abhorrent Jewish entity sustainable?

Eight decades of this culture has ensured that we now have an entity which has complete impunity from international law and breeds a "society" (if you could call it that) that believes they are god's chosen people and entitled to most of West Asia.

"No civilised humans would ever want to live in such a toxic environment, but this collection of Jews thrive in it. Ironically, it is they, and not the Palestinians, who are dehumanised."

They parents bring up their kids in this corrosive environment and don't even realise the monsters that they are nurturing. No civilised humans would ever want to live in such a toxic environment, but this collection of Jews thrive in it. Ironically, it is they, and not the Palestinians,  who are dehumanised.

We see that some of the more decent of them are fleeing and the entity is really scraping the barrel when it comes to recent inward migration. They have even targeted some small Jew community in India to boost their numbers. I'm quite certain that these Indians will not know what hits them when the apartheid nations racism is targeted at them.

It is a nation that has been fighting wars for the last 2 decades with support and funding from the Europeans. With the collapse of the empire this funding is running dry. The citizens of the sponsoring nations are beginning to ask rational questions rather than swallowing the drivel fed to them by the Epstein class and Mr. Mileikowsky. Their governments are collapsing left right and centre - support for the abomination has become a poisoned chalice. The Epstein class may still attempt to attribute their thrashings in elections to other factors, but they fully know that their citizens will not tolerate it any more - not in their name.

The resistance movements are strengthening and their reputations globally are rapidly transforming from terrorists and villains to brave roaring lions resisting a primitive barbaric regime - not dissimilar to the changes in image that took place in South Africa before the collapse of it's apartheid regime.

No doubt, there is significant investments in the Jewish European colonial project. The risk was high and the returns were extraordinary for some sectors - in particular the military industrial complex. Increasingly the colony is falling on the wrong side of the ledger. Even the Arab fiefdoms provide more opportunity for profit and corruption.

The question is, does Israel have anything to offer anymore? The rational answer is No. It is likely that the 6-7million Jews will not leave voluntarily. The death pangs will be horrendous and the civilised world would need to absorb it. But the civilised world needs Israel like a bullet in the head - it is likely that they will rather do without.

Note: The terms Zionist and Jew are used interchangeably as per IHRA definition.