Is Bishop the quintessential Blonde Bitch . . . ummm, I mean Bimbo?!!

Sorry, just using her own parlance! Maybe it’s acceptable for a woman to call another a bitch in parliament, but people do get their knickers in a knot when a guy uses the term on a woman. So, let’s leave aside the Bitch and focus on the Bimbo!

The Bishop and the Bitch!

There are a few of aspects relating to Blonde Bimbos that are undisputed.

1. Most of them, aren’t blonde
2. They are blonde, because when viewing through Western societies’ lenses, Blonde is sexy and sexy is good - gets you further in life!
3. As they are usually operating at a level of incompetence, they are susceptible to many a gaffe!

OK, I’m no expert on hair colour, but she sure does have dark roots(pardon the pun!!) and that is as far as I will take that part of the discussion.
Bishop has undoubtedly had a privileged upbringing and has clearly leveraged her sex appeal (and possible blondeness) to good use – a classic case of “nice from far, but far from nice”! Through-out her life she has been the show-pony, at Clayton Utz, even attending Harvard (do they select on sex appeal?!)! Apart from being the blonde show-pony, she had all the tick boxes checked!
Despite all of this, this is a woman that the “Fiberal” party never see as leading them. Yes, she’s great to have as the side-show glamour chic, but not the the front and centre leader. To her credit, she has clung on to many a court tail, swapping beds as required to maintain her role as the show pony.
When the PM was away in Paris, recently, the Bimbo was in charge! There were just two matters that the Bimbo had to address and in true neo-con, Liberal style, the Bimbo simply gave inaccurate facts (Aussie media is incapable of holding our politicians accountable, they simply pass on the drivel that the politician excrete.).

1. The contribution to the Climate fund
2. The phone call she was involved in with Morrison and Turnbull

On the former, Australia burdened by Climate change sceptics and introverted selfish drivers,  has been dragged along kicking and screaming in to the conference in Paris. Turnbull has shown circus like skills in juggling the various Looney views of his party and still presenting a half-respectable front at the conference (although continually being shown-up as a spoilt, selfish, climate change pariah, in all the papers being presented). Being the largest Island in the world, it’s going to be awhile before Australia is under water, so Australians are completely inept in their ability to understand all the fuss!
When pointed out that Australia’s commitment to the Climate fund was a re-allocation from the Aid budget rather than new funding, Bishop towed the party line of admitting that (somewhat a surprise as the “Fibs” usually simply lie and move on -  Malcolm obvious decided not to lie on this matter). But rather than stop at that, Julie could not help, but add some farcical lies about how “that is what the leaders of the island nations wanted”!!!
Unfortunately, once again, we were in Bimbo territory. Which pacific nation would say to Australia that they should not add more funds, but simply divert the aid budget to climate change?! What is worse is that the Aussie media simply listened and broadcast this drivel – no questioning or even more appropriately ridicule, what-so-ever!
The second matter was in relation to her “Lady Macbeth” like role in the leadership shenanigans. Clearly Abbotts and Bishop’s recollection of the events are poles apart. At least one of them is fabricating stories and most probably they are both. The Australian public almost expect this of their Fiberal politicians. Strangely enough, not so from their Labor party representative – remember the Gillard big lie – Carbon Tax?!

The Bishop knives the Abbott.

Some of Ms Bimbo’s explanations for her conduct between February 2015 and the spill were simply torturous to listen to. Every other word was a fabrication.

Bed hopping deputy.

More recently we had the hilarity of the swapped missing islands!

Another Julie Bishop Bimbo moment!!

Even then, Ms Bimbo had the audacity to blame that insensitive stuff up on the Labor party!!! On the direct competition front between the bimbo and her Nemesis, Plyberseck, it’s 2 to zip on my count!
Of course, We are well versed with the “Fiberals” attitude to the endangered pacific Islands.

We love our Islander neighbours!
Bishop was the beneficiary of the missile attack on MH370. This was the puuurfect opportunity for Abbott and Bishop to gain some popularity back home through some sabre rattling on the global stage. The dreary black suited politicians just loved having the spunky blonde amongst them. So whilst Australia may have lost a few lives, they did the most sabre rattling. Accusing Putin and threatening to “Shirt front” (I must admit, it was not purely the Russians that dived into that Oxford dictionaries attempting to understand the exact meaning of the phrase, yours truly was quite mystified too!) another global leader for what was clearly an error, whether it be by the Russians or any other party. This was one instance where the term collateral damage was possibly excusable.
Abbott had his 15 minutes of glory and Bishop, maybe 25. But pretty much everything Australia did during that period was a complete stuff-up – either a bit pre-mature or based on completely wrong information. The world leaders to it for what it was – a marketing spiel targeted at domestic politics.
Aussies love their blonde chics. So, it’s not surprising that the media has not shown-up Bishop for what she is. Bitch? Bimbo? both? – that is for each of us to decide. Blonde? – that is for each us to guess – Yours truly thinks not!

The future is in great hands!

Just as you give-up hope on a generation of device glued gamers and YouTubers… then comes along Jake! A well-rounded individual of brilliance and a touch of class! I’m sure Jake is not the sole representative of his generation.

Jake’s particular circumstances may be extraordinary. It is hard to view this video other than through a lens reflecting his situation, but that is precisely what we should not do. The speech was written much earlier and would always have portrayed the same messages.

Listening to Jake, one couldn’t help but think that this was not simply a young man who had collected some great quotations and cobbled together a speech. It was a young man who truly believed in the core messages that he was presenting and lives by them. He did not come across as a know-all, arrogant teenager that we are all too familiar with. He appeared considered, consultative and deeply respectful of the environment he was in – the school and it’s rich heritage, the old boys, the teachers and of course, his cohort of students.

The future is in great hands–Jake Bailey, Head Monitor Christ Church Boys High School

The speech is overflowing with invaluable messages to us all and especially to his and later generations – a must see for all teenagers. Most of these obvious to the listener. But there are also some less grandioso but nevertheless touching moments in the video

Just prior to Jake commencing his speech, as the mic is being setup, the principal reassuringly pats him on the shoulder and exhales – a natural human release of tension, an unguarded moment sneaking through the brave facade being presented by all – clearly a reflection of the thoughts, the emotions and the “battle” going on in the principal’s mind. He pats him again at the end conveying a gratitude from all present and now, the many millions that have viewed this video.

The Haka, although somewhat contrived, is symbolic of the level of integration of the original inhabitants of NZ – the influence, appreciation and uptake of this culture, rich in symbolism. Where Australia has failed dismally (except when it is commercially beneficial). The very fact that the Kiwis would naturally resort to a Haka in such a poignant moment simply adds many layers of colour to their national identity. The inclusion of an indigenous welcome in his speech. The youthful handshake at the end – uplifting!

The singing of the school song that appeared to be completely spontaneous – Altiora Peto. (See the full video).

I refuse to associate sadness with Jake. Although I am grateful (to whom, I’m not sure) that the prognosis for him, may be quite positive. We should all simply celebrate what Jake represents – a generation of brilliant, idealistic young men!

“Some achieve in a few years what others may aspire to in a lifetime.”

For many a parent of teenagers, including yours truly, who are troubled, confused and battling the age of body technology, gaming and tubing, who rarely get the pleasure of encountering young men with the qualities of Jake, this is truly inspiring and liberating. His generation, is well prepared to right the mess that our generation and previous have created and left for them.

It is a generation that sees through the colour of peoples skin and their religions.

It is a generation that truly values diversity, egalitarianism and liberalism.

It is a generation that is not obsessed with petty minded selfish materialism at the exploitation of others.

It is a generation that is truly global, rather than tribal, nationalistic or divided by religious belief like their predecessors.

It is a generation that will blast through the problems that we have created in regions such as the Middle East and our environment.

It is a post imperialist generation, with holistic human values unrivalled by any previous – Altiora Peta

The change has already started in Canada with the election of a Prime Minister that in many ways is closest to representing the value set of this generation. It didn’t really take much to have equal representation of men and women or substantive representation of minorities in a government – simply a genuine belief in what was best, fair minded and right. This could have been achieved anytime in the last 3,000 years of democracy, but

“previous generations have been myopic small thinkers, constrained by their own narrow minded view of humanity, self interest, tribal instincts based on race and religion.”

Stuff the crude, racist, crusader heroes of the past, I say – Churchill and Bush are simply a pedestal for the Jakes of the future.

“The future is indeed in great hands!”

Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust I screeem!!

I scream Holocaust from every roof top because the word needs to be liberated! It’s a word that since WWII has been completely stifled and monopolised by the Jews. So much so that if used in any other context, it is considered offensive!!

As was recently witnessed, when the former captain of Team Australia – a complete puppet of Israel – got his nickers in a knot over the use of this word!

Abbott’s Holocaust gaffe–courtesy of Youtube

The strength of the Jewish lobby has even resulted in a sub-definition of “The Holocaust” being included in the oxford dictionary which refers specifically to the horrendous atrocities inflicted on the Jews in Europe. Clearly this would not have been the case prior to WWII.

It is also interesting that at the very time that the Jewish holocaust was taking place, there was another, of equal devastation (6-9 million) happening in India – Churchill’s Holocaust on the sub-humans of Bengal through wilful starvation. One that very few, if anyone, are aware of or cares about. There were some differences in that they were not murdered with bullets or guns but simply allowed to starve to death on the streets by taking away their food and diverting it to feed the rich fat Englishmen and their armies fighting in Europe. Effectively, they were robbed of their food and left to starve.

Churchill’s Holocaust–The Bengal famine.

Of course Western nations prefer to be ignorant of the crimes they committed as Winston Churchill (A recent prominent leader of the SuCs) said of the event

“I hate Indians. They are a beastly people  with a beastly religion. The famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits”

and when the Delhi government sent a telegram painting a picture of the devastation

“Then why hasn’t Gandhi died yet?”

So much for the heroes of the SuCs! – all note worthy causes for being awarded the Nobel prize for “defending exalted human values”!! Clearly some humans have more value than others and sub-humans have none what-so-ever!

Here are some of the other Holocausts that purely due to the victims being non-whte, non-christian sub-humans, have not really been on the radar.

- Hiroshima and Nagasaki

- Killing fields in Cambodia

- Guantanamo Bay

- Palestine

- Tutsi’s

Who are the GuSWhiSuCs?!

 

The name GuSWhiSuCs (in short, the SuCs pronounced “Sooks”) comes from the GUngho-Saxon-WHIte-SUpremacy-Crusaders. This is simply a collective noun used to describe a group who otherwise don’t have a collective noun, much like the term Al Quaeda or Daesh.

The SuCs are of Anglo-Saxon heritage and have controlled the world for a near 300 years. Their power is based on military might and they have a rather Gung-ho approach to most things, particularly when it comes to demolishing other civilisations and people around the globe – thereby Gunho-Saxon

They strongly believe in White Supremacy and maintaining the power balance to ensure that Whites do continue to control the world and they use their religion Christianity to justify the horror that they spread through-out the world.

They have maintained a thousand years of Crusades against the Islam religion and continue to do so.

In their modern manifestation, the three main contributors to this group are the British, USA and Australia. There are only 2 other nations who are Anglo Celtic dominated – NZ and Canada – who have shown a dislike to the gung-ho mentality of this group, and to-date have refrained from joining the crusader expeditions of the group.

The term SuCs suits them well, as they mostly engage in wars in other countries, using military weapons that are vastly superior to their enemy – weapons that are fired from miles away, ensuring that none of their personnel are in danger. They use their slaves (Ghurkhas, Israel, the Iraqi and Afghanistan governments etc.)  to perform the dangerous work.

In their on-going pursuit to maintain their power and enforce their value set, they are usually in direct conflict with the UN and the more considered nations of Europe.

The horrors caused by their actions are mostly experienced when the pleb SuCs elect mad hatter right wing leaders.

In their minds, they are the protectors of the universe and there is just one and only one god – their god all mighty – ALLELUJAH!!

This is not to say that every one of Aglo-celtic decent belongs to this mob a vast many do not. Nor is it unusual for a regime to cling on to their power by performing atrocities – we have seen this from time memorial – Greeks, Romans, Mongolians etc. Nor is it possible to say that the next “super” power will be any better.

It’s just that they have been fortunate to be in power during the period when power became truly global. It has also been a period when human weapons reached a point where we can destroy the whole world in a matter of seconds. Therefore it will take longer for power transitions to take place. WWII did dismantle some of their strangle-hold with close to 7 billion of their slaves finding freedom.

The Economy and population have now become the new nuclear bomb. This will really shake the mob up. So will the domination of the SuCs be coming to an end?!!!

Are Dumb and Dumber leading the Australian Cricket Team?!

 

A few months ago (say during the ashes test series), if you asked the question, who are the dumb crickets in the Aussie team (or in the world, for that matter), it is very likely that most would have included Steve Smith in that list. Then if you followed that up by asked the question, who would you consider to be dumber, then undoubtedly, most would have included Warner! – get my drift?!

One might argue that if Steve was on the list, so would everyone else on that ashes tour – Khawaja was not on the team then. Fair argument. It’s not that everyone knows that Steve is dumb, it’s more that we don’t know that he isn’t, we usually classify all Aussie cricketers dumb and he mostly appears to be an amicable, naive country bumpkin, to whom there was nothing more to life than smacking a cricket ball around the park.

It is disconcerting when Cricket Australia (CA) appoints as skipper, a player that hasn’t even been a certain selection in the team just a few months prior to his appointment.

This has happened before, but usually when there is some wise ole’ sage with years of cricket experience backed by a degree in nuclear physics from Cambridge! Appointed for their brilliance in strategy and leadership – a la Mike Brearley changing the course of a whole ashes series!

Smith was selected as a bowler and didn’t really get to bowl and then to the relief of CA scored a gazillion runs in the most whimsical manner (I used to think it was an embarrassment that Australia would have to resort to players with such atrocious batting techniques, in the test arena).

“Place-holder for Smith’s crazy shots video!!”

To their credit (I think?!#$%), CA backed this kid, just as they had done with other “untouchables” like Hughes – untouchable only because they would be given all the easy opportunities to cement their places whilst their competition would be given the real tough conditions to fail – thereby justifying CA’s decisions – Khawaja being one of the victims – it’s great to see him flourish now that he has finally been given the opportunity to play on conditions that he is accustomed to – an opportunity to succeed.

The timing has been great for Steve, The schedule appears to provide him a lengthy honey-moon period with the initial test series being against Bangladesh, NZ and the West Indies. NZ could have been a competitive affair if they had played on more reasonable pitches with some time acclimatise to them – rather than the Blacktown paddy-field debacle (since when did touring test teams play games in Blacktown?!!! – we will be accommodating them in Blacktown too! – close to the grounds, you see!).

For a nation that likes to whinge about other nations’ pitches, the Blacktown debacle was a real doozy!!

The GABBA and WACA (arguably the worst test pitch on earth) are real gimme’s for the Aussies – no other country really wants to play on them. The third test in Adelaide, where there might have been some competition will be the “pink ball test”!! I doubt any Kiwi, at test level or otherwise, has played with a pink ball!!! So, the CA have mitigated the potential risk of a loss, brilliantly!

But there are some real refreshing aspects to Smith’s captaincy as well. He clearly has not been in the team for long enough to have ingrained in him the typical Aussie cricket culture.

“Having been the lackey in the team, he obviously wasn’t involved in much of the nonsense that Aussie teams are reputed for and proud of.” 

I don’t recall Smith ever being involved in any distasteful behaviour on the cricket field or otherwise – unlike his predecessor who was involved in 3 unsavoury incidents and was promptly rewarded by the CA with his appointment as vice captain!!!

Since when has an Aussie player or official (let alone skipper) ever admitted something negative about a team member. It was refreshing to see Smith, in his usual unassuming naive manner say he would have to have a word with his fast bowler after the nasty ball throwing incident!

Smith really does have an opportunity to change the rotten culture of the team. Australia has just played against a couple of teams where the culture is the complete opposite to theirs – England and NZ. Will Smith’s attitude rub-off on the team or will the CA culture override him and bring him into line? – time will tell.

If Smith does bring a change in culture, then it will completely destroy my theory that the reason Aussie cricketers are thugs and louts is because of the low level of intelligence and self-esteem in the team. See, the louts such as Ian Chappell, Rodney Marsh and the many who followed will never be esteemed as gentlemen or role models as is the case with the Sangakaras,Tandulkars, Lloyds or even the Strauss or Gowers of the world – but that’s a story for another day.

I’d rather a well behaved fair minded Aussie team than my theory remaining accurate! Go on Smith – here is your challenge!

Are Australian Company Boards the dumbest?!!

There will be thousands of kids who would be relieved after just completing their HSC this week. Amongst them will be the kids of first or second generation migrants. And a great proportion of that will be Asian migrants – Australians don’t see European (yes, “white”) migrants as migrants at all, migrants are Asian or African.

In a few weeks the results will be published and when one reads the honours list, one tends to have a quick flick to the front page, just to make sure one was reading an Australian news paper (ok, the banner on your web page)! The names will all be Asian with some exceptions of Eastern Europeans.

At the same time, there will be hundreds of boards meeting around Australia and all of them, without exception, will be as white as white can be. Ok, there are some exceptions, where some Asian tycoon has setup a company in Australia.

Several months back, the SMH published some humorous charts on the capabilities of students and their ethnicities “Asian students more likely to be in HSC honours list”.

All

 

Whaaaaat?!!! the English are the worst at English?!!!!

Well, that’s not entirely surprising. Which Englishman (or woman) with any intelligence would leave England and Europe to live in Australia?!! As for the Welsh, well, one can excuse them, they have there own insufferable language!

The only reason to question this data is that . . .

. . . apparently the Irish can Add?!!! – that’s gotta be a joke of some sort!

Somewhat questionable, judging the experiences of yours truly!

Apart from that minor aberration, it is undoubtedly the case that the cream of the crop are from Asia. This trend is maintained in universities as well (although it’s harder to get the data), and all the way to lower-middle management. But that is where the infamous “bamboo ceiling” hits. There is little representation in senior management and board rooms.

So the verdict has to be that

Aussie company boardrooms are gatherings of white people who can’t Add, Can’t write English and have no Logical capability!!

The question is, How can this be?!!

The standard white conservative answers to this questions are

1. “it will take time”!

2. Asians lack the “soft skills”

All of them, true. However the latter applies to every race and the first one really depends on the willingness to change.

Q&A recently touched on this issue and the responses of any intellectual substance came from, yes, you guessed it – an Asian and an American!

Q&A discussion on Racism against Asians

Taxi drivers with the highest IQ in the world are in Australia. They are usually Phd qualified from all non-white parts of the world! At least one can have an intelligent conversation while in a cab!

The “It will take time” excuse

Yes, it will take time and it will take even longer in Australia. Remembering that Australia is

“One of only 2 countries that have ever had a codified apartheid regime against coloured – the white Australia policy”

The racism against Asians is deeply rooted in a majority of white Australians. Asians are great when they serve Aussies on cheap holidays and when the pervert oldies want a sex slave for a wife, but otherwise they are either “curry munchers” or “bow legged yellow skins”.

The efficiency argument brought up in the video, simply does not work in Australia. Australia has never been efficient at anything. It is an economy based on digging up cheap minerals and resources out of the ground and selling it to other countries. There simply is no need for efficiency in that.

Due to the small population and the low population density, many foreign companies stay away from Australia rather not compete in this Market. Banks are a classic example. The foreign banks came in when the sector was deregulated, but were mostly gone within 5 years. And so, Australian banks are arguable the most profitable collusion in the world.

And when efficiency is irrelevant, the majority can afford to be racist and suppress the more capable minorities – particularly so when there is an over supply of skills.

Asians Lack “soft” skills

This is another wonderful invention. The definition of soft skills is really skills that are completely subjective. It is purely an invention to make any assessment of skills for a role subjective rather than objective.

As was mentioned in the video, there are many Asians with the so called “soft” skills and capabilities to lead companies in Australia, just as they are doing in Asian countries that will soon surpass Australia.

There is a saying in Australia that

if you wake up in a hospital and the doctors are all Anglo Celtic - then get the hell outa there!

In other words, it is unlikely that there would be doctors or surgeons of Aglo-Celtic decent – it is likely to be a scam of some sort!

The moral of the story is that, in any field where deep skills are required to perform a role, it will be dominated by Asians and non Anglo – Celtics. It is the roles where no skills are required where “soft” skills appear to prop up, and needless to say, these roles are dominated by Anglo-Celtics. This is also the reason that Australia will remain the lucky country rather that the smart country

Asian migration, as controlled as it is, is increasing the IQ of Australia.

So, there is some chance, the Asians will be able to drag Australia out of the deep mines into the Asian century and make Australia competitive and even intelligent. Maybe one day

The Taxi drivers will be leading our companies and the directors driving our taxis!

Maybe that would cause a safety hazard on the roads!

Would the world have been a better place without Bush, Howard and Blair?

Roccoco Fazzari

A Response to: An apology for the Iraq war is nowhere near enough (SMH 26th October 2015)

It’s taken over a decade for the public and the journalists of these three nations to outwardly hint that maybe the Iraq war was a right royal stuff-up. When I criticised the gung-ho decisions of the Anglo-Celtic leadership a decade ago, SMH would, duty-bound, sensor my comments and now Blair and Hartcher feel it’s been long enough for the public to be spoon fed the reality.

I refer to this mob as the Gung-ho Saxon, white Supremacy, Crusaders (GuSWhiSuCs - pronounced “sooks” at the end and in short the “SuCs”) for good reason.

What is evident is that

We have learned little in a near thousand years of crusades!

Remember some of the others?! Richard the Lion heart, Bush the Lion Heart, Howard the “I’ll lick ya ass” heart and Blair the “I’m lost for words” heart!

It is a mistake to believe that the whole Iraq crusade was simply an error in judgement due to poor intelligence. It was far more sinister than that. The “Suks” had already murdered close to a million Iraqi children alone through embargos on critical medication on an astonishing pretext that they would be used to create nuclear weapons! A nuclear industry dependent on imported medical supplies!! – now that would be a force to be reckoned with.

The mentality of the pleb “SuCs” is to knowingly accept these ridiculous claims by their leaders, when it comes to justifying a crusade against a seemingly weaker military force. Yes, there were some protestors on the streets of Sydney (including the author), but a majority wrapped themselves in national and white supremacy flags and engulfed themselves in patriotism and pride out of displaying military might and blasting to smithereens an age old “enemy”! It was someone else’s war and someone else was going to suffer from it.

Wars are easy to handle when they occur 10s of thousands of miles away from home.

Yes, a few poor sods come back home maimed or in boxes, but that’s a small price to pay for the pride it gives the pleb “SuCs”. The leaders, particularly the near fascist far right factions, know this well and exploit it - a la Thatcher and the Falklands, Bush and a whole list of dumb wars, Eisenhower and Vietnam. We now don’t even get anywhere near the fireworks – we simply fire missiles from a bunker in a different continent! and as the military general of the SuCs proudly announced on TV

“We don’t count the civilian dead of the enemy, they are mere collateral damage!”

The more considered would say that the “SuCs” engineered the cause for war. The appointment of a gang member – Butler – with the sole mission of creating falsified evidence that would support a war (described well by Pilger). Butler may have made millions by it (and the profits of crime – his book), but it cost 224,000 lives (a number that is grossly underestimated). Butler was appointed simply because the UN’s representative was undertaking a more rigorous approach and the findings just didn’t suit the gang’s leadership – the rest of Europe watched in bewilderment as the blood thirsty pleb SuCs marched passionately to the drums of war!

Whilst it is possible to miss evidence of something that DOES exist, it is near impossible, with any level of competency, to find evidence of something that does NOT!

The very fact that the crusade was launched at all, is evidence that the SuCs were certain that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. True to their name, the SuCs would never have waged war against a nation with such weapons.

Nuclear weapons are the great equaliser!

So, the public’s acceptance of an apology (or non-apology) is just a means of rationalising the war crimes. It is interesting how the journalist have not used the term “war crime” in this instance. Just imagine if this atrocity was committed by Russia or China! Just look at the uproar over China installing some military hardware on some desolate islands! Or, the SuCs inability to accept that the downing of the Malasian Airlines aircraft was truly an example of collateral damage!

The “SuCs” self righteous view of themselves prevent them from accepting that this was a heinous war crime. One that has lead to an unprecedented disaster!

In any case, the SuCs Leadership is well protected against war crimes. The Heads of state cannot be prosecuted. Even though, these very same protections were dismissed and overlooked by the puppet court established by the SuCs to murder Saddam. Yes, murder!!

If the laws of the nation do not allow you to prosecute the head of state and you setup an instrument with the sole purpose of illegally killing somebody – that is the very definition of murder!

Ah! but the SuC chieftains have explained it to the pleb Sucs as “the world is a better place without Saddam” –  Still a response by them when asked if with hindsight, they would have engaged in the crusade. The question we really should be asking ourselves is

Would the world have been a better place without Bush, Howard and Blair?!!

or even better

Who’s done more damage to the world, Saddam or Bush, Blair and Howard?!!!

But that is a question that the GuSWhiSuCs are incapable of assessing rationally!